An anti-US blast from China

So much for the US and China having patched up relations – the Communist Party’s mouthpiece has just slammed the US in an editorial.

“Is the US ready for China’s ascent as a great power?” the People’s Daily asked on Thursday, warning that the two countries are on collision course if Uncle Sam doesn’t give way.

2010 got off a bad start for bilateral relations, with a dispute over American arms sales to Taiwan. Then came the Google standoff, followed by wider complaints that Beijing discriminates against foreign technology suppliers when awarding public procurement contracts.

As a result, Washington and Beijing both made an effort, and calm seemed to have been restored. But, if the People’s Daily is to be believed, there are more squabbles to come.

According to its editorial:

[Despite increasing dialogue] some deep-seated structural contradictions in the Chinese-American relationship have not been softened. On the contrary, in the process of close contact, the collision of interests between the two sides could increase.

Some less hawkish observers have expressed surprise. “I’m puzzled by the tough tone,” says Teng Jianqun, a military expert at the China Institute of International Studies in Beijing. ”

However, the People’s Daily editorial is no outlier. It caps a week of rants from Chinese government officials, military officers and state media, after Hillary Clinton last week identified stability in the South China Sea as a US national interest.

Clinton called for regional dialogue about tension in the South China Sea, but a joint manoeuvre by US and South Korean troops, intended as a warning to North Korea, was furiously denounced as hostile by China.

The People’s Daily makes clear that this is not just about military and regional security issues:

Arms sales to Taiwan, the Google incident, manipulation of the Renminbi valuation issue, spreading the theory that China was responsible for the financial crisis …. Washington has by no means clarified its thinking and calmed down its feelings about how to deal with a rapidly developing China.

It moved on to reject the expectation that China would become more tolerant with growing global influence: “When it comes to our national interests, China has no room to manoevre.”

That’s not what the Obama administration had hoped to hear.

Related reading:
Why Taiwanese companies are latecomers to China, beyondbrics
US wary of upsetting its new friend, FT.com

Global equities macromap

Number of the day

15.3% Fall in Chinese imports in January, leaving China with a trade surplus of $27.3bn on the month.

Featured posts

Facebook

How much are EMs worth to the company?

European aviation

Malev will be missed

beyondbrics

The emerging markets hub

About this blog Headlines email Blog guide
News and comment from more than 40 emerging economies, headed by China, India, Brazil and Russia.



'Like' our beyondbrics Facebook page, where we showcase a top story of the day
Sign up for our news headlines and markets snaphot service. We have two emails per day - London and New York headlines (sent at approx 6am and 12pm GMT).

To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

There is an overall beyondbrics RSS feed, as well as feeds for all our countries, tags and authors. Learn more in our full RSS guide.

All posts are published in UK time.

Get in touch with us - your comments, advice and even complaints. Find out how to contact the team.

See the full list of FT blogs.

BB shortcuts

Regulars Series Archive
Chart of the week
Behind the numbers

Fund flows
Tracking money in and out of EM bonds
12 for 2012
Guest posts on key trends for the year ahead

Brics at 10
A decade of growth
The Diaspora Digest
EM diasporas, seen through their community media (Oct-Nov 2011)
Sick brics (Sep 2011)
Brics and mortar (Aug 2011)
Beyondbrics on the beach (Jul-Aug 2011)
China bubble? (June 2011)
Post-election Nigeria (June 2011)
Hey bric spender (Aug 2010)

Emerging markets data

Archive

« Jun Aug »July 2010
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

What we are writing about