Friday May 16 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

November 7, 2006

Wheeling and dealing

To understand the often down and dirty world of EU policy-making, look no further than last week’s battle to get a revised deal over rules on working hours.
The EU’s "working time" directive states that employees cannot put in more than 48 hours a week, even if they want to.
The law has become a symbol of the divide between "liberal" and "social" Europe - but has left both sides stretching their principles.
The idea that Brussels caps working hours, (its reasonings are health and safety) on health and safety grounds) is incomprehensible to some.
This includes "liberal" Britain, which "opts out" of the rules.

Spurred by the business lobby, London once again saw off French-led demands to scrap the British "opt out" as part of the EU’s efforts to overhaul the laws.
Britain can keep its long-hours culture because for now it has enough support to block France.
Why?
Because years ago Tony "open markets" Blair did a backroom deal with Germany. He helped Berlin get a loophole in the EU takeover directive that would protect companies such as Volkswagen from hostile bids. In return, he received Germany’s votes on working time.
What’s more, Britain in September offered an unsuccessful deal to Italy under which it would back Rome’s demand for punitive tariffs on cheap Chinese shoes - to get  Rome’s votes.
London was prepared to put aside its free-trade principles to secure support for the opt-out.
But are its opponents any better?
French president Jacques Chirac - wary of the response of trade unions and his socialist opponents as his country’s election campaign gathers pace - wouldn’t budge over his call for London to scrap the British opt-out.
France country currently has a 35-hour week. Paris believes Britons shouldn’t have a competitive advantage by choosing to put in extra time.
But the French use an opt-out so doctors and nurses can work more than 48 hours. This helps to address a European court ruling limiting the hours of medical staff.
And 14 countries that oppose the British exemption quietly apply the 48-hour cap to the job not the worker, according to the UK. That theoretically allows employees to put in a 96-hour week.
This shows the debate is increasingly irrational. But when it comes to pleasing domestic audiences on "big" Brussels deals, anything goes.
Sarah Laitner

Post a comment

Comment Policy




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business