April 27, 2007
Hot air and high principle
The week’s parliamentary session in Strasbourg had the usual mix of the sublime, the ridiculous and a dash of unexpected drama. Above it all hung the usual question of what we were doing here by the sunsoaked Rhine. That was given added spice by the revelation by the Green party that the monthly commute to the French city gives off as much carbon as a small island state about to be drowned by global warming.
The drama came on Wednesday when Bronislaw Geremek, the Polish former dissident who has become the conscience of the parliament in the last few years. His refusal to sign a further declaration that he had not collaborated with Communist secret police draw a rare standing ovation. Party leaders rallied to his defence denouncing witch hunts and Stalinism. His 53 Polish colleagues, who have signed the declaratons, were noticeably quieter - except those from the ruling Law and Justice party who howled because the deputy speaker stopped them answering the charges. They - like Geremek - are desperate not to be seen as Euro-quislings. If he has his mandate revoked; the ex-foreign minister said, he could return to Poland and have direct contact with the people, continuing his fight at home. That day also saw a climactic vote to allow medicines derived from embryonic stem cell research on to the market, after a debate that pitched liberals against moral conservatives.
There also was interesting news for air travellers.
MEPs, who are as fed up as the rest of us with long queues and having their whisky confiscated because of the ban on big bottles of liquid, said new security measures should be reviewed every six months. They also called for sky marshals - or air cowboys as one termed them - to be strictly controlled. Governments in all states flown over by an aircraft that carry a marshal must agree. They also voted that, while passengers should foot the bill for minimum security standards at EU level, national authorities should pay for any goldplating.
It seems MEPs forget where governments get their money - the taxpayer. Surely those who can afford to fly and choose to do so should pay for the privilege of being protected. MEPs will now enter talks with EU governments, who oppose the measures.
Meanwhile the British Conservatives claimed barge tourism was about to be priced out of existence and librarians were threatened with jail for photocopying books.
The first problem was solved by an amendment reducing the cost of insurance for canal boats. Maritime safety legislation sought to put domestic traffic on the same footing as that between EU members.
The second threat remains, after MEPs approved criminal sanctions at EU level for the first time. They cover counterfeiters and infringers of intellectual property rights. Nicola Zingaretta, who authored the report, said that teenagers and other small-scale downloaders and photocopiers will not be targeted.
The debate is academic for the moment as plenty of national governments have no desire to see it enter into law and it requires unanimous approval.
The parliament also had a crack at the “politicised” UN human rights council and called for the head of Paul Wolfowitz.
They also signed a motion demanding the release of Alan Johnston, the BBC Gaza correspondent held hostage, as colleagues continued to highlight his plight. Richard Howitt, who brought the motion, had met Johnston himself on trips to the region, as had many other MEPs.
In a more practical move, MEPs led by Karin Riis-Jorgensen and Simon Coveney proposed a Europe-wide hotline for victims of human trarfficking, often forced into prostitution in third countries. This was a practical measure asked for by campaigners working with victims. Many do not speak the language of the country they have been taken too so even if they can reach a phone cannot call for help. The line will be staffed with who can co-ordinate with police. A similar one for abused children, financed by the Commission, has worked well.
Riis-Jorgensen, a no-nonsense Dane, said: “This is still a taboo subject. We care about pigs being transported in cages and people will collect signatures in the street to end that but we don’t care about women being exploited.” Two hundred years after the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade, there are more than ever, say campaigners.











“AGED BRAZILIANS ASK FOR TO AID THE INTERNATIONAL AMNESTY”. The Group of aged former Handles of the Brazilian Air Force, comes to ask for helps the canals of the International presses, that this substance in the direction publishes to show the Authorities of the International Amnesty, that the Law of Amnesty Politics 10559/2002., does not come being fulfilled to the four years for the o “GOVERNMENT OF BRAZIL”, where comes harming aged people, fragile, defenseless and sick and that it does not have more as much time to fight for its rights. In the period of 1964 á 1985, years that were installed the Military dictatorship in the Country, where it was a shameful fact and without military honor. The Generals of hard Line fortified by the o “(AI-5) INSTITUCIONAL ACT Nº. 5”, using to advantage that the Constitutions of 1946 and 1967 had been disrespected for Presidents Militares, had taken Brazil in hand great e had arrested politicians torturing all in the bilges of the quartéis, had covardemente killed thousand of innocents covardemente for the coasts, had disappeared with hundreds of families and had played thousand of Brazilians in the seas through the ships of the Brazilian Navy, had curtailed the expression rights and thought of the free Press, the Judiciary Power was on the control of Presidents Militares. The sharpened Brazilian Handles of the Air Force with the “New Regimen” had not been legislated by Portaria 1.104/Gm3/1964 that through it, the Officers for determination of the Commanders, humiliated, tortured and spanked all barbaramente, where some did not support arriving until dying, and those whom they continued livings creature, were submitted weighed the training of military exercises compared with the Regimen of slavery, until completing eight years of cash services, and later they were sumariamente expulsos as “subversive of deep Communist” for Portaria 1.104/Gm3/1964 without right the nothing, which the Law of the Military Service and its Statute had been opposed by the High Command of the Air Force Brazilian inthe period of 1964 á 1982. IT WOULD CARRY IT 1.104/GM3/1964, it was harmful, dangerous, disloyal and criminal an instrument at the hands of the Cruel Commanders of the Brazilian Air Force, where it punished subordinated culprits and military innocents, who were the service of the Native land in the period of the “MILITARY DICTATORSHIP” E today, the President of the Republic of Brazil Luis Ignácio Squid that if proclaimed a democrat, when taking knowledge of whom it happened with aged the former military of the Brazilian Air Force in the truculenta “Military dictatorship”, also violates the Law of the Amnesty Politics 10559/2002 opposing the biggest Constitution of the Country, that is the CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL, dividing the unit in two categories: daily pay and after 1964, amnestying ones harming others, with discriminatory judgments for the same classroom of Former military who had been punished in the same situation, which to be governing similar to the period of the “Tyrants, Emperors, Reigns, and of Presidents Militares”, where Laws were not fulfilled by the Governing, and with this, the majority of the population was penalizada. With descumprimento of the Law of the Amnesty Politics 10,559/2002, and sets of ten of Laws disregarded for the Brazilian Government, where our Constitution of 1988 total was disrespected compared the Constitutions of 1946 and 1967 pisoteadas by the o Government of the Military Regimen, Are a shame a democratic governor that in the ínicio of its mandate, swore to defend our Constitution, and today break the oath giving continuity the occured repression in the times of the Dictatorship. The Group of aged the Former military of the Brazilian Air Force only wants Mr. Presidente of Brazil Luis Ignácio Squid, the fulfilment of the Law of AMNESTY POLITICS 10559/2002, opposed four years and three months for the administration of its Government.
Posted by: Sidney Rogério de Lima | May 1st, 2007 at 1:44 am | Report this comment