February 6, 2008
Hair-raising times ahead for Berlusconi?
It is difficult to find anyone in Brussels who is enthusiastic about the likely return to power of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy. When you mention his 2001-2006 premiership, and especially the way he ran Italy’s European Union presidency in July-December 2003, you sometimes see that rarest of sights - a Eurocrat shuddering in revulsion.
But if Berlusconi wins the elections forced by the collapse of Romano Prodi’s government, I predict interesting times ahead. Not because Berlusconi will once more make himself an outcast by comparing German members of the European parliament to Nazi concentration camp guards. Rather, because it is in Brussels that his massive conflict of interest, between his political role and his position as Italy’s pre-eminent media tycoon, may at long last be challenged.
Through his family-controlled Fininvest empire, Berlusconi runs Mediaset, by far the biggest commercial TV broadcaster in Italy. His empire also runs the biggest national advertiser, the biggest publisher and much else. Given Italy’s long tradition of political interference with public sector broadcasting, this means that when he has been prime minister he has wielded influence over almost everything watched by Italians on TV, from news programmes to adverts.
But on January 31 the European Court of Justice made a first dent in Italy’s unusually concentrated media market when it ruled that the national broadcasting system failed to foster competition. In essence, the court recognised what anyone who has lived in Italy (I did so for five years) knows: the present system is a stitch-up between Mediaset and Rai, the state-controlled broadcaster.
This was an important moment because it reminded Italians that, even if they cannot fix what is wrong in Italy, Europe can sometimes do it for them. Since Berlusconi entered politics in 1993-94, turning his media dominance into a serious national issue, Italy has had two spells of centre-left government - 1996-2001 and May 2006 to the present day. In neither spell did the centre-left succeed in passing laws to reform the media sector or curb politicans’ conflicts of interest.
One can speculate as to the reasons why. In the late 1990s, it was perhaps because former premier Massimo D’Alema was too clever by half and Berlusconi outmanoeuvred him. More recently, Prodi’s government was probably too weak and divided to pass such laws - though it had promised it would.
In any event, the spotlight will now move to Brussels. Buoyed by recent victories such as the landmark Microsoft case, the EU competition authorities have never felt stronger when it comes to taking on corporate power. At some point in Berlusconi’s future premiership (assuming he wins the election), it is a safe bet that a test case challenging his media dominance will under the scrutiny of Brussels.
The credibility of the EU as a regulator with worldwide influence will be on the line. But so, too will the reputation of the multi-billionaire Berlusconi. It will be some spectacle.











It will indeed be a spectacle with “Il Saltimbanco: back on stage….
Posted by: pampero | February 6th, 2008 at 5:51 pm | Report this commentLet’s talk more about this “assuming he wins the election”. I assume your assumption is correct, but I have yet to read a satisfactory explanation for why Italians seem so keen to vote for this man. It can’t be entirely due to propaganda, surely. Please enlighten us.
Posted by: Badgerblu | February 6th, 2008 at 6:49 pm | Report this commentThe answer to the question is that Italians are very peculiar in the way they think. We are mostly a country of shopkeepers and tiny industry owners and these people think they are small Berlusconis. Hence they are convinced that if Berlusconi makes his own interest he will make also their, although on a different scale. Sick, unbelievable, maybe even comic under anglosaxones standards unfortunately a sad truth for us.
Posted by: Andrea Fanelli | February 27th, 2008 at 8:17 am | Report this commentNot sure I fully agree with comment that Italy is mostly a country of shopkeepers and tiny industry owners. Well over half of Italy’s 40m taxpayers are wage earners and pensioners who have their taxes deducted at source and who are therefore not small business owners or “small Berlusconis”. I believe the Italians need to get used that the fact that painful change is required to get their country moving forward and they support Berlusconi because, unlike Prodi and his finance minister, Padoa-Schioppa, he is not prepared to makes these unpopular changes.
Posted by: Derval O\'Neill | February 28th, 2008 at 9:52 am | Report this comment“This was an important moment because it reminded Italians that, even if they cannot fix what is wrong in Italy, Europe can sometimes do it for them.” HERE HERE! I have been making this point for some time, right here in Rome, whenever I get into political discussions with cynical, jaded Italians who believe they are just permanently screwed. It may take time, but it will be Europe — not Italy itself — that restores order to this kleptocracy.
Posted by: Giacomo | March 9th, 2008 at 7:55 pm | Report this comment[…] in Politica and contrassegnato da tag: Berlusconi, Europa, Financial Times, Tony Barber Stando a Tony Barber, la prospettiva di un ritorno del Cavaliere a Palazzo Chigi farebbe accapponare la pelle agli […]
Posted by: Mamma Europa e il discolo Silvio « Era un mondo adulto… | April 4th, 2008 at 12:21 am | Report this commentI do not agree with some opinions I read here:
Someone could be so honest to explain which “unpopular changes” did Prodi ?
His “government” was a total failure.
Example ? Neaples, managed by Bassolino.
The only thing this “government” did was to raise up taxes and to punish the here so called “small Berlusconis”.
Well I realli think that here the famous Financial Times are really gone …
Posted by: hellstrike | May 1st, 2008 at 8:34 pm | Report this comment