The first time I interviewed Giulio Tremonti, he was in shirtsleeves and a pair of bright braces, puffing confidently on a cigar in Milan. At that time he was finance minister in Silvio Berlusconi’s centre-right Italian government, and there’s no denying it, he looked every inch the part.
Now, as Italians prepare to vote in their April 13-14 election, Tremonti is playing a more populist tune. He’s just published a book, Fear and Hope, which lashes out at globalisation and condemns “the dictatorship of the market”. He also calls for a “new Bretton Woods”. Today’s Tremonti, some may think, has more in common with his protectionist political opponents on the Italian far left than with the Tremonti of 2003.
In truth, Tremonti was always fairly suspicious of globalisation, once remarking that Europe would end up in the pot of a Chinese cook if it wasn’t careful.
All this matters because opinion polls suggest Berlusconi will win the election and, being a creature of habit, he will probably appoint Tremonti as finance minister, just as he did in 1994 and 2001. Then what will happen?
Tremonti can’t single-handedly rip Italy out of all the free trade commitments by which it must abide under European Union rules. However, it is not difficult to imagine Berlusconi and Tremonti lining up in support of French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s calls for “community preference”, an anodyne phrase behind which lurks the threat of higher import tariffs on non-EU goods.
Perhaps this is one reason why European Commission president José Manuel Barroso warned in his recent Financial Times interview that protectionist forces were on the rise in the EU, including on the centre-right. A victory for Berlusconi and Tremonti, far from signalling a triumph for the spirit of dynamic Italian entrepreneuralism, would strengthen the defensive, inward-looking forces of Europe.
The UK and other free trade advocates such as Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden need at this point to consult their copies of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. In Act II Scene I they will find that Brutus, when looking for a reason to justify Caesar’s assassination, said that the point wasn’t Caesar’s actions so far, but the future danger Caesar represented. “And therefore think him as a serpent’s egg/ Which, hatch’d, would as his kind grow mischievous,/ And kill him in the shell.”
So the message to Tremonti must be: Giulio, wear those braces if you must, but we can’t let the serpent’s egg of protectionism grow to full size.
Across the globe: Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs on