Back to Brussels Blog homepageThis morning I found myself on a public platform in a Brussels hotel for my first ever European bloggers’ conference. As a representative of an “establishment” news organisation, I was half-expecting to be roasted alive. But in the end both Mark Mardell of the BBC, my friend and fellow-guest, and I got through it safely enough.
The most perceptive contribution, I thought, came from a Romanian blogger who made the point that the global blogosphere remains to a large extent divided by language. For example, you can blog all you like in Romanian, but most of the world won’t have a clue what you’re saying.
A moderator responded to this by saying, “Try using computer-generated translation.” As I drifted back to my office, I recalled that the last time I’d experimented with computers striving to change Italian into English or Dutch into Spanish, the results had been pretty hopeless. Perhaps things had improved over the last couple of years?
Well, below are three examples of computerised translation - courtesy of Google Language Tools - from French, German and Polish into English. I am republishing the translations exactly as they came out, punctuation mistakes and all, after I hit the button.
1) This is from a news story in Le Monde about US and European policy in the Middle East. “Believing that the war in Gaza has imposed new priorities and the administration of the new American president, Barack Obama, might break with the unconditional support to Israel, French diplomacy is trying to print in Europe, a change of tone against the Hamas.”
As you can see, this translation starts off promisingly. In fact, it scarcely puts a foot wrong until it loses control and talks, weirdly, about printing changes of tone against the Hamas. Still, we sort of know what’s going on here. 7 out of 10 for Monsieur L’Ordinateur.
2) Now here’s a sentence from a story in Germany’s Süddeutsche Zeitung about the US prison centre at Guantánamo and what Europe can do to help close it down. “The fate Released Guantanamo prisoners ensures fierce debates: Union politicians criticized the foreign ministers of Vorpreschen Stein Meier - and refer the responsibility for the inmates to the U.S.”
This is a pretty poor effort, Herr Computer. Particularly disappointing is the omission of the preposition “of” between “fate” and “released” (which also shouldn’t have a capital R), and the baffling three words “Vorpreschen Stein Meier”. But let’s be fair, there’s a modest degree of sense here. 5.5 out of 10.
3) Lastly, here’s a sentence from the Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza on French leisure habits during the recession. “Economic crisis and changing lifestyles, the French seriously affect the profits of French cafes and restaurants. A sign of the collapse of the French culture of the restaurant is visible on the streets of Paris rash of quick-service bar, offering generally pogardzane a few years ago and cheeseburgery hamburgers.”
No, dear readers, you have not gone potty. That’s what it says. And I am afraid, Pan Komputer, that it’s utter gibberish. You get 2 out of 10 - and an hour’s detention in the language lab.
I have been the FT's Brussels bureau chief since September 2007 and was previously the bureau chief in Frankfurt and Rome. In this blog you'll find my thoughts on everything from the European Union's foreign and economic policies to the fortunes of its political leaders - as well as the more light-hearted aspects of life in Europe.
