Recession dashes the EU’s Lisbon Strategy hopes

Anyone remember the Lisbon Strategy? This was a grand European Union programme, adopted almost exactly nine years ago, to turn the EU into “the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy” in the world by 2010. It set a number of specific targets, such as average annual economic growth of 3 per cent and an overall employment participation rate of 70 per cent.

Given the crisis the world economy now faces, it would be cruel and gratuitous to mock the EU’s lofty ambitions of March 2000. Suffice it to say that a new report prepared by Allianz, the German insurer, and the Lisbon Council, a Brussels-based think-tank, says that Europe’s recession “is so severe that none of the countries surveyed can presently come up to the Lisbon goals”.

Assessing how far each country falls short is by no means a futile exercise, however. Michael Heise, the report’s principal author and Allianz’s chief economist, ranks the EU’s 14 largest economies according to six criteria – economic growth, productivity growth, jobs, human capital, future-oriented investment and sustainable public finances.

His conclusion is that Finland comes top, with strong results in human capital (that famous Finnish education system), public finances, and research and development (allocated an impressive 3.45 per cent of gross domestic product a year). Second comes Poland, which scores well on economic growth and productivity growth but badly on jobs.

Heise estimates that if the recession had not intervened, six countries would have been on track to meet their Lisbon targets by 2010 – Finland, Greece, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and Sweden. The Spanish performance is a bit of an optical illusion: Spain improved its labour productivity, but only by shedding jobs on a massive scale.

Who’s been doing worst? Very striking is the fall from grace of Ireland, which crashed to 13th in this year’s rankings from fourth in 2008. The Irish performance in economic growth, productivity and public finances makes grim reading.

And bottom of the pack, like last year, is Italy. Italy’s persistent lack of business competitiveness compared to Germany, and its tendency to be the first eurozone country to fall into recession whenever the economic outlook darkens, are an extremely serious long-term concern for Europe’s monetary union.

Brussels blog

Notes from the EU

About this blog Blog guide
This blog covers everything from the European Union's foreign and economic policies to the fortunes of its political leaders - as well as the more light-hearted aspects of life in Europe.


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the Brussels blog team: Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The Brussels blog authors

Peter Spiegel is the FT's Brussels bureau chief. He returned to the FT in August 2010 after spending five years covering foreign policy and national security issues from Washington for the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times, focusing on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He first joined the FT in 1999 covering business regulation and corporate crime in its Washington bureau, before spending four years covering military affairs and the defence industry in London and Washington.

Joshua Chaffin is one of the FT's EU correspondents, covering areas including policies on trade, the environment and energy. He has worked in the FT's Brussels bureau since late 2008 and before that was an FT correspondent in New York and Washington DC.

Alex Barker is EU correspondent, covering the single market, financial regulation and competition. He was formerly an FT political correspondent in the UK and joined the FT in 2005.

FT blog: The World

Across the globe: Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs on The World blog.

In the news

Archive

« Feb Apr »March 2009
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031