Monthly Archives: May 2009

The closer the European Parliament elections, the sneakier the stratagems of British centre-right politicians and activists in Brussels.

As David Cameron made clear on May 18 when he launched the election campaign of his opposition Conservative party, the Tories are poised to leave the mainstream European People’s Party-European Democrats (EPP-ED) group soon after the vote.  They plan to set up a new centre-right group in the EU legislature that would be strongly opposed to more EU political and economic integration.

My eyes bulged in amazement last week when I read the news from Germany.  The policeman who shot dead an innocent civilian in a West Berlin street demonstration in 1967, an event that set off more than a decade of leftwing violence in West Germany and influenced the country’s political direction for even longer, turns out not to have been an ordinary Berlin cop at all.  He was an agent of the communist East German Stasi secret police.

As historical revelations go, this is hard to beat.  US-based bloggers have made the point that it is as if the infamous 1970 killings of four students at Kent State University had been carried out not by the Ohio National Guard but by KGB men infiltrated on to the campus.

It’s quiz time, and here’s your starter for ten.  Which 18-year-old hottie home-breaker, as the European tabloid press is calling her, recently made the immortal statement:  “I want to be a showgirl.  But I’m also interested in politics.  I am flexible.”

Yes, it’s Noemi Letizia, the teenager at the centre of a divorce suit launched against 72-year-old Italian premier Silvio Berlusconi by his wife, Veronica Lario.  Reading the interview that young Noemi gave to the Corriere del Mezzogiorno newspaper (“I often sing with Papi Silvio at the piano, or we do karaoke”), it’s hard to know who to feel more sorry for – Lario, Noemi’s ex-fiancé Gino Flaminio, or the entire 60m Italian people.

Like an athletics race in a deserted stadium, the campaign for the European parliamentary elections is set for a tense finish – and few except the most dedicated fans are watching.

The use of “ethnic profiling” by European police forces dates back to well before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.  Since then, there is no doubt that the practice has become more widespread in Europe.  But in terms of preventing or solving crimes, how useful is it?

A study published today by the Open Society Justice Initiative, which campaigns for law reform and the protection of human rights, argues that ethnic profiling is “may be pervasive, but it is inefficient, ineffective and discriminatory… Ethnic profiling strikes at the heart of the social compact linking law enforcement institutions with the communities they serve.  It wastes police resources, discriminates against whole groups of people, and leaves everyone less safe.”

Never mind the recession, what about the après-crise?  Hope springs eternal in the human breast, wrote Alexander Pope.  And so it is that fashionable Europeans are devoting their thoughts not to the mundane matter of extracting their continent from the worst economic crisis in four generations, but to the altogether more interesting question of how to enjoy the post-recession future.

Interactive map: the election campaign across Europe FT

Q&A: guide to the European elections FT

Why Europe’s parliament deserves a vote of confidence FT

Elsewhere:

Ruling elite under fire in EU elections EU Observer

Margot Wallstro¨m blogs Think about it

Declan Ganley, demagogue or dilettante? The Economist

Gloomy weather on the campaign trail Richard Corbett MEP

Key issues European parliament

Tony Barber is away. The Brussels blog will return towards the end of May.

Opinion polls show that the general European public has got only the vaguest idea of what the European Parliament does. So here is a personal six-point guide:

1. The parliament has equal power with the Council of Ministers (national governments) in deciding most European Union-wide laws. This will increase to cover virtually all EU legislation if the Lisbon treaty comes into force next January.

2. The parliament cannot propose legislation, which is the European Commission’s exclusive right.

3. The parliament can amend the annual EU budget proposed by the Commission and Council. It must approve the final version. But its budgetary powers are otherwise more limited than those of a typical national parliament.

4. The parliament must approve or reject the Council’s nominee for Commission president.

5. The parliament can force the entire Commission, but not individual commissioners, to resign.

6. All members of the European Parliament have the right to make complete fools of themselves, as did Mogens Camre of Denmark today in some choice remarks about how Nordic people are more clever than people from the Balkans.

The 73-year-old Camre is deputy leader of a nationalist-conservative faction in the parliament known as the Union for Europe of the Nations. He told a French interviewer: “When I look at the voting rules, I see that countries like Bulgaria and Romania have many more votes than Denmark and Sweden and Finland, and I think – honestly speaking – that we are more clever than they are. We have much more transparency, democracy and social welfare. And we don’t think that people who did not create healthy societies should decide for us.”

Excellent! And I see that some polls are predicting that the next European Parliament will contain even more Camre types than it does now…

Across Europe, politicians of various political stripes are stamping their feet in impotent fury. José Manuel Barroso, the centre-right Portuguese leader who has served as European Commission president since 2004, seems strongly placed to secure a second five-year term. His enemies and critics would love to stop him, but all they can do is boo from the sidelines like disappointed children.

Barroso’s adversaries, especially on the left, have only themselves to blame. If they wanted to torpedo his reappointment, they should have put forward a candidate for Commission president in next month’s European Parliament elections. But petty rivalries, unseemly personal ambitions and a good deal of incoherent political tactics put paid to that. By contrast, Europe’s centre-right parties rallied behind Barroso, even if some supporters held their noses when they agreed to back him.

The task of appointing a Commission president lies with the leaders of the European Union’s 27 national governments, who, when they make their choice, are supposed to take account of the results of the latest European Parliament elections. Barroso has been busy hoovering up support over the past two years from heads of state and government such as France’s Nicolas Sarkozy (centre-right), Germany’s Angela Merkel (centre-right), the UK’s Gordon Brown (centre-left), Spain’s José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero (centre-left) and quite a few others.

It’s true that some heavyweights in the pro-Barroso camp, when pressed, don’t sound especially passionate about his abilities or his record at the Commission. But when EU leaders gather in Brussels for a post-election summit next month, it is hard to see how any name other than Barroso’s will win approval. Though he has come under fire for his inadequate crisis management last September and October during the near-meltdown of Europe’s financial system, the simple truth is that, on the whole, he hasn’t caused much offence to anybody.

Except, of course, a large number of leftists, centrists, Greens and others who sit in the European Parliament. Belatedly, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the Franco-German Greens co-president, has appealed this week for a socialist-Green alliance, with others welcome to join, that would be big enough to deter EU leaders from nodding through Barroso’s reappointment.

But still the question remains: Who would the socialists prefer to run the Commission? I am in the dark – but I get the impression there’d be little point asking Martin Schulz, the German leader of the parliament’s socialist group. He simply won’t be drawn on the matter. Whether that’s because he has his eye on becoming Germany’s next member of the Commission, replacing Günter Verheugen, only time will tell.

Brussels blog

Notes from the EU

About this blog Blog guide
This blog covers everything from the European Union's foreign and economic policies to the fortunes of its political leaders - as well as the more light-hearted aspects of life in Europe.


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the Brussels blog team: Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The Brussels blog authors

Peter Spiegel is the FT's Brussels bureau chief. He returned to the FT in August 2010 after spending five years covering foreign policy and national security issues from Washington for the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times, focusing on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He first joined the FT in 1999 covering business regulation and corporate crime in its Washington bureau, before spending four years covering military affairs and the defence industry in London and Washington.

Joshua Chaffin is one of the FT's EU correspondents, covering areas including policies on trade, the environment and energy. He has worked in the FT's Brussels bureau since late 2008 and before that was an FT correspondent in New York and Washington DC.

Alex Barker is EU correspondent, covering the single market, financial regulation and competition. He was formerly an FT political correspondent in the UK and joined the FT in 2005.

FT blog: The World

Across the globe: Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs on The World blog.

In the news

Archive

« Apr Jun »May 2009
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031