Pro-EU Tories snipe at Cameron and his “PiS poor policies”

The closer the European Parliament elections, the sneakier the stratagems of British centre-right politicians and activists in Brussels.

As David Cameron made clear on May 18 when he launched the election campaign of his opposition Conservative party, the Tories are poised to leave the mainstream European People’s Party-European Democrats (EPP-ED) group soon after the vote.  They plan to set up a new centre-right group in the EU legislature that would be strongly opposed to more EU political and economic integration.

Among their likely allies in this new group are the Czech Civic Democrats, Poland’s Law and Justice party, and a few smaller parties from both old and new EU member-states.  All in all, Cameron’s group may number up to 65 MEPs, making it perhaps the fourth largest in the future legislature, according to Jan Zahradil, a Czech Civic Democrat who sits in the EU assembly.

For the purposes of this blog, you need to know that Law and Justice is a party whose initials, spelt in Polish, are PiS.  This explains why a document emanating from EPP-ED circles, and attacking Cameron and the Tories for planning to break ranks, carries the malicious headline:  “Cameron’s Polish Six-Pack: ’PiS Artists’ or serious allies?”

The document goes on to denounce six Law and Justice candidates for the European parliament as weirdos and extremists, the sort of fruitcakes with whom a decent, modernising sort of leader like Cameron shouldn’t even be dreaming of forming an alliance.  The six in question are Urszula Krupa, Jacek Kurski, Miroslaw Piotrowski, Ryszard Czarnecki, Ryszard Legutko and Zbigniew Ziobro.

The document sums up its case as follows:  “The key problem David Cameron faces is that the party of Lech and Jaroslaw Kaczynski is a deeply unattractive ally – and a quite unnatural bedfellow – for the ‘progressive Conservatism’ that the Tory leader seeks to present.  Law and Justice, from the top down, has shown itself to be a hardline, socially conservative force, opposed to gay and minority rights – and its economic policies are as illiberal as its social ones.  Overall, its views on a wide range of issues sit uneasily with Mr Cameron’s modern style of Conservatism.”

Now, the author of this document – who is obviously a Brit, because the ‘Pis Artists’ joke doesn’t work except in English – may or may not be right to accuse the six Polish candidates of holding unusual or even extreme opinions.  But the real message from this smear campaign is that British Tories in Europe remain as divided as ever.

Some understand all too clearly that to withdraw from the EPP-ED will mean to lose influence in the European Parliament and across the wider international stage.  Others insist the Tories should never have been aligned with the mainstream centre-right parties in France, Germany and elsewhere in the first place, because the Continentals are far too keen on closer EU integration.

A third group of Tories, possibly the largest, simply want to do whatever their leader wants and focus on the benefits that will come from winning the big prize – the next UK general election.  These are serious divisions and will not be easily laid to rest through the mere act of splitting from the EPP-ED.

Still, far be it from me to echo the anonymous writer of the EPP document - and suggest that the Tories are incapable of organising a PiS-up in a European brewery.

Brussels blog

Notes from the EU

About this blog Blog guide
This blog covers everything from the European Union's foreign and economic policies to the fortunes of its political leaders - as well as the more light-hearted aspects of life in Europe.


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the Brussels blog team: Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The Brussels blog authors

Peter Spiegel is the FT's Brussels bureau chief. He returned to the FT in August 2010 after spending five years covering foreign policy and national security issues from Washington for the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times, focusing on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He first joined the FT in 1999 covering business regulation and corporate crime in its Washington bureau, before spending four years covering military affairs and the defence industry in London and Washington.

Joshua Chaffin is one of the FT's EU correspondents, covering areas including policies on trade, the environment and energy. He has worked in the FT's Brussels bureau since late 2008 and before that was an FT correspondent in New York and Washington DC.

Alex Barker is EU correspondent, covering the single market, financial regulation and competition. He was formerly an FT political correspondent in the UK and joined the FT in 2005.

Stanley Pignal is Brussels correspondent for the Financial Times, covering EU justice, home affairs, social developments, telecoms and the Benelux region. He joined the bureau in January 2009, having previously worked for the FT as a corporate reporter in London.

FT blog: The World

Across the globe: Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs on The World blog.

In the news

Angela Merkel Belgium Budget credit ratings agencies EU presidency EU summits European banks European Central Bank eurozone Finland Germany Greece Herman Van Rompuy Hungary IMF Italy Jose Manuel Barroso Libya Mario Monti Michel Barnier Nato Nicolas Sarkozy Olli Rehn Portugal Schengen Silvio Berlusconi sovereign debt crisis Spain Viktor Orban

Archive

« Apr Jun »May 2009
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031