“Mother of all rescue plans” buys Europe time – but can it work?

The €500bn eurozone stabilisation package agreed in the early hours of Monday, to be topped up by as much as €250bn from the International Monetary Fund, represents the first time since the Greek debt crisis erupted in October that European political leaders have moved decisively ”ahead of the curve”.  All along, the only way of calming financial markets was to produce an initiative that would exceed their expectations and convince them that Europe would do whatever was necessary to save its monetary union.

This has now happened, but it is not the end of the story.  The emergency plan will be presented in Brussels as a triumph of the European will – and in some respects it is – but the IMF’s participation will be crucial to the plan’s success.  One lesson from the crisis is that eurozone authorities on their own lack the credibility to enforce the necessary discipline on countries facing serious public finances problems.  IMF involvement is essential.  The eurozone’s stability and growth pact continues to look too weak to do the job, whatever reinforced procedures are announced later this week by the European Commission.

The rescue plan deserves praise, but the eurozone’s difficulties, in the form of yawning budget deficits and huge private and public sector debts, have not gone away overnight.  Fiscal retrenchment and austerity will still have to be the order of the day for the next three years at least, and it is very much an open question whether governments have the political nerve and the support from their societies to sustain the unpopular policies that will be required.

Brussels blog

Notes from the EU

About this blog Blog guide
This blog covers everything from the European Union's foreign and economic policies to the fortunes of its political leaders - as well as the more light-hearted aspects of life in Europe.


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the Brussels blog team: Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The Brussels blog authors

Peter Spiegel is the FT's Brussels bureau chief. He returned to the FT in August 2010 after spending five years covering foreign policy and national security issues from Washington for the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times, focusing on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He first joined the FT in 1999 covering business regulation and corporate crime in its Washington bureau, before spending four years covering military affairs and the defence industry in London and Washington.

Joshua Chaffin is one of the FT's EU correspondents, covering areas including policies on trade, the environment and energy. He has worked in the FT's Brussels bureau since late 2008 and before that was an FT correspondent in New York and Washington DC.

Alex Barker is EU correspondent, covering the single market, financial regulation and competition. He was formerly an FT political correspondent in the UK and joined the FT in 2005.

Stanley Pignal is Brussels correspondent for the Financial Times, covering EU justice, home affairs, social developments, telecoms and the Benelux region. He joined the bureau in January 2009, having previously worked for the FT as a corporate reporter in London.

FT blog: The World

Across the globe: Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs on The World blog.

In the news

Angela Merkel Belgium Budget credit ratings agencies EU presidency EU summits European banks European Central Bank eurozone Finland Germany Greece Herman Van Rompuy Hungary IMF Italy Jose Manuel Barroso Libya Mario Monti Michel Barnier Nato Nicolas Sarkozy Olli Rehn Portugal Schengen Silvio Berlusconi sovereign debt crisis Spain Viktor Orban

Archive

« Apr Jun »May 2010
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31