Barack Obama gets surprisingly tough with Detroit

Having just watched Barack Obama’s televised remarks about GM and Chrysler, the most striking thing was that, after a gentle start praising the historic strengths of the industry and its place at the heart of the US economy, he got remarkably tough.

First, the president said openly that they might have to go into Chapter 11 bankruptcy to meet a 60-day deadline for restructuring, in the case of GM, and 30-day deadline, in the case of Chrysler:

“Both need a fresh start to implement the restructuring plans they develop. That may mean using our bankruptcy code as a mechanism to help them restructure quickly and emerge stronger. Now, I know that when people even hear the word “bankruptcy” it can be a bit unsettling, so let me explain what I mean. What I am talking about is using our existing legal structure as a tool that, with the backing of the US government, can make it easier for General Motors and Chrysler to quickly clear away old debts that are weighing them down so they can get back on their feet and onto a path to success; a tool that we can use, even as workers are staying on the job building cars that are being sold.”

Well, Amen to that. One of the most frustrating things about the auto companies’ statements in the past few weeks has been their insistence on equating Chapter 11 bankruptcy and restructuring with liquidation. The administration has correctly seen through this ruse.

Second, however, Mr Obama insisted that the US government would let Chrysler actually go bust – not just to enter Chapter 11 – if it does not reach a partnership deal with Fiat or another company.

“If they are able to come to a sound agreement that protects American taxpayers, we will consider lending up to $6bn to help their plan succeed. But if they and their stakeholders are unable to reach such an agreement, and in the absence of any other viable partnership, we will not be able to justify investing additional tax dollar to keep Chrysler in business.”

I am not entirely sure that I believe this – that the US government would stand by and let Chrysler go down – but Mr Obama has put it clearly on record so it would be hard to back out. It will certainly have the effect of making the 30-day deadline to get a Chrysler-Fiat deal done bite.

Business blog

Strategy & managing

About this blog Blog guide
This blog is mainly about business and strategy and how and why people who run companies take the decisions that they do.

Most of the time, John Gapper is in New York and Andrew Hill is in London. We occasionally debate business issues between us, but your comments and criticism are welcome.




To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact andrew.hill@ft.com or john.gapper@ft.com about the Business blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

About John and Andrew

John Gapper is an associate editor and the chief business commentator of the FT. He has worked for the FT since 1987, covering labour relations, banking and the media. He is co-author, with Nicholas Denton, of All That Glitters, an account of the collapse of Barings in 1995.

Andrew Hill is an associate editor and the management editor of the FT. He is a former City editor, financial editor, comment and analysis editor, New York bureau chief, foreign news editor and correspondent in Brussels and Milan.

Archive

« Feb Apr »March 2009
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031