Facebook follows Google’s dubious example

Silicon Valley’s commitment to shareholder democracy – or to public shareholder democracy as opposed to the influence wielded by venture capital firms – does not seem to be strong.

The news that Facebook has established a dual-class share structure, converting its existing shareholders to Class B stock carrying 10 times the voting rights of Class A shares, suggests that (despite its denials) Facebook is readying itself for an initial public offering.

It is also falling in line with Google, which created a dual-class share structure for its IPO in 2004, which also gave 10 times the voting power to some shareholders. Eric Schmidt, the company’s chief executive, and Larry Page and Sergey Brin, its co-founders, control the majority voting rights as a result.

Mr Page and Mr Brin wrote of this arrangement in their founders’ letter to shareholders:

“While this structure is unusual for technology companies, similar structures are common in the media business and had a profound importance there. The New York Times Company, The Washington Post Company and Dow Jones, the publisher of The Wall Street Journal, all have similar dual class ownership structures. Media observers have pointed out that dual class ownership has allowed these companies to concentrate on their core, long-term interest in serious news coverage, despite fluctuations in quarterly results.”

Five years on, Google is doing a great deal better than the models for its dual-class share structure, with the possible exception of the Bancroft family, which cannily sold out to News Corp for $5bn in 2007. That raises the question of whether such structures really protect long-term shareholder value.

Whether or not they do, Silicon Valley founders such as Mark Zuckerberg seem to like the idea of being able to sell shares to the public – making themselves rich in the process – without relinquishing control. It is a nice arrangement if you can get it.

Another devotee of the dual-class share structure is Rupert Murdoch, who is now locked in combat with Google, making it a fight between B share-protected species.

Business blog

Strategy & managing

About this blog Blog guide
This blog is mainly about business and strategy and how and why people who run companies take the decisions that they do.

Most of the time, John Gapper is in New York and Andrew Hill is in London. We occasionally debate business issues between us, but your comments and criticism are welcome.




To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact andrew.hill@ft.com or john.gapper@ft.com about the Business blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

About John and Andrew

John Gapper is an associate editor and the chief business commentator of the FT. He has worked for the FT since 1987, covering labour relations, banking and the media. He is co-author, with Nicholas Denton, of All That Glitters, an account of the collapse of Barings in 1995.

Andrew Hill is an associate editor and the management editor of the FT. He is a former City editor, financial editor, comment and analysis editor, New York bureau chief, foreign news editor and correspondent in Brussels and Milan.

Archive

« Oct Dec »November 2009
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30