Anil Kumar’s cheap betrayal of McKinsey’s soul

On the front of the McKinsey & Co website is a link to a McKinsey Quarterly article titled Motivating People: Getting Beyond Money.

It is a good topic, for the biggest question about the involvement of Anil Kumar, a McKinsey director, in an insider trading ring allegedly headed by Raj Rajaratnam of the Galleon hedge fund, is why he put his own reputation – and that of the firm – at risk for $2.6m.

Mr Kumar has agreed to forfeit this money, which is said to have been paid to him in return for providing inside information on companies he gleaned through his work at McKinsey, and apologised in a New York court for the “shame and embarassment” he caused his colleagues.

It is a shocking incident for McKinsey, like other blue chip advisory firms such as Goldman Sachs, depends on being trusted with its corporate clients with confidential information.

So far, McKinsey appears to have escaped lightly enough from the affair, although that would change if any other cases of its directors leaking information came to light.

But why on earth did one of McKinsey’s most senior employees break the rules so egregiously simply for material gain? Are McKinsey partners not paid enough as it is?

Perhaps not, is the answer. The annual distribution per partner at McKinsey has fallen from its peak as a result of the financial crisis and, although we do not know the figure since McKinsey is a private firm, is much less than the annual bonus of a senior investment banker.

The case of Mr Kumar shows that at least one McKinsey partner could be bribed for a fraction of what Wall Street’s elite earns.

What would Marvin Bower, the partner who built the modern McKinsey – and who passed on his stock to his partners at book value on his retirement rather than put it into debt – have thought?

Bower, dubbed “the soul of McKinsey”, would not have been impressed, it is safe to say. Rajat Gupta, a former McKinsey managing director, says of Bower:

“Convinced that behaviour and conduct are every bit as important as skills and expertise, Marvin sought to build the firm into an enduring, values-based institution.”

Among the five principles laid out on its website is:

“Keep our client information confidential. We don’t reveal sensitive information. We don’t promote our own good work. We focus on making our clients successful.”

No wonder Mr Kumar was so emotional in a New York court about what he did.

Business blog

Strategy & managing

About this blog Blog guide
This blog is mainly about business and strategy and how and why people who run companies take the decisions that they do.

Most of the time, John Gapper is in New York and Andrew Hill is in London. We occasionally debate business issues between us, but your comments and criticism are welcome.




To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact andrew.hill@ft.com or john.gapper@ft.com about the Business blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

About John and Andrew

John Gapper is an associate editor and the chief business commentator of the FT. He has worked for the FT since 1987, covering labour relations, banking and the media. He is co-author, with Nicholas Denton, of All That Glitters, an account of the collapse of Barings in 1995.

Andrew Hill is an associate editor and the management editor of the FT. He is a former City editor, financial editor, comment and analysis editor, New York bureau chief, foreign news editor and correspondent in Brussels and Milan.

Archive

« Dec Feb »January 2010
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031