Companies controlled by the US government seem to have a lot of difficulty maintaining an amicable balance of power between their chairmen and their chief executives.
Harvey Golub’s abrupt resignation as chairman of American International Group after a stand-off between him and Bob Benmosche, AIG’s chief executive, is a second example of the phenomenon.
Before this, it was Ed Whitacre, who was appointed chairman of General Motors but decided that he would like to take the job of Fritz Henderson, GM’s former chief executive.
In general, US executives have difficulty with the notion of dividing power at the top of companies betweeen a non-executive chairman and a chief executive. It requires a degree of teamwork that they often exhort among employees but have trouble sticking with themselves.
As Mr Golub put it in his resignation statement:
“Bob Benmosche has informed the Board that he believes our working relationship as Chairman and CEO to be ineffective and unsustainable. At this point, I view asking the Board to choose between us would be an abdication of my responsibility to lead. Consequently, I’m resigning for the simple reason I believe it is easier to replace a chairman than a CEO.”
The US government opted to divide responsibilities in this way at the top of companies that had to be bailed out by taxpayers. The executives involved, however, are having trouble with the idea.
It does not reflect well on any of them.