London is acquiring a dangerous reputation for US financial institutions.
The financial crisis in 2008 was set off by the London-based derivatives unit of American International Group, which was insuring potential losses for banks. Now, JP Morgan Chase finds itself in trouble over a $2bn hedging/trading loss in London.
As the FT reports this morning:
Ina Drew, the head of the Chief Investment Office, Achilles Macris, head of the London-based trading team, and Javier Martin-Artajo, another member of the team, are all set to depart, according to a person familiar with the situation.
Among questions being asked internally is whether it was right to base the unit in London, at a distance from the bank’s New York headquarters.
Compare this with what happened at AIG Financial Products in London, as described by Gretchen Morgenson in the New York Times in September 2008:
In the case of AIG, the virus exploded from a freewheeling little 377-person unit in London, and flourished in a climate of opulent pay, lax oversight and blind faith in financial risk models. It nearly decimated one of the world’s most admired companies, a seemingly sturdy insurer with a trillion-dollar balance sheet, 116,000 employees and operations in 130 countries.
London’s role in credit derivatives is not surprising since, as my colleague Gillian Tett described in her book Fool’s Gold, the credit derivatives market originated in London – and JP Morgan played a large part in inventing it.
And, of course, large investment banks now operate fairly seamlessly between London and New York, with trading desks that span the Atlantic. JP Morgan’s CIO was one of them, since Ms Drew was based in New York.
Nonetheless, if I were running a big US bank, I would want to check carefully on what those people in London are up to.






Older entries


