Daily Archives: November 23, 2009

Bromley illustration

From now on, hesitate before you call the Obama administration timid. Its decision to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed and four other alleged 9/11 conspirators in a civilian court in New York City, rather than before a military commission in a far-off place, is brave. It is also unwise.

This is not for the reasons emphasised by most critics – that a civilian trial is better than these men deserve, or that it will give them a platform for propaganda. The real problem is that the decision involves a needless risk, while failing to improve the legitimacy of the US government’s approach to terror trials.

Ideally, suspected terrorists should be tried under the same rules as people accused of other serious crimes. The horror of the offence is irrelevant. This should be obvious, but to judge by some of the attacks on Eric Holder, the attorney-general staking his career on the issue, it is not. The idea that a civilian trial is simply too good for the likes of KSM is indefensible, and that is all one can say.

The remainder of this article can be read here. Please post comments below.

Clive Crook’s blog

This blog is no longer updated but it remains open as an archive.

I have been the FT's Washington columnist since April 2007. I moved from Britain to the US in 2005 to write for the Atlantic Monthly and the National Journal after 20 years working at the Economist, most recently as deputy editor. I write mainly about the intersection of politics and economics.

Clive Crook’s blog: A guide

Comment: To comment, please register with FT.com. Register for free here. Please also read the FT's comments policy here.
Time: UK time is shown on Clive's posts.
Follow the blog: Links to the Twitter and RSS feeds are at the top of the blog.
Schedule: Clive's column appears in the FT on Mondays and you can read an excerpt of it on this blog.
FT blogs: See the full range of the FT's blogs here.


« Oct Dec »November 2009