Daily Archives: December 23, 2009

Harry Reid turns insurance into a public utility. Richard Epstein, WSJ

Can Congress tie its own hands? Eric Posner, Volokh Conspiracy. (Via Marginal Revolution)

Healthcare reform is no done deal. John Heilemann, New York

Votes for sale in the Senate. Michael Gerson, RCP

Peter Suderman at Reason says that “the major provisions of ObamaCare have already been tried. And they don’t look good.” New York combined guaranteed issue and community rating in 1993, and destroyed the individual insurance market.

New York’s reforms haven’t worked out very well, according to a 2009 Manhattan Institute study by Stephen T. Parente, a professor of finance at the University of Minnesota, and Tarren Bragdon, CEO of the Maine Heritage Policy Center. In 1994 just under 752,000 individuals were enrolled in individual insurance plans, about 4.7 percent of the nonelderly population. This put New York roughly in line with the rest of the U.S. Today that figure has dropped to just 0.2 percent. By contrast, between 1994 and 2007 the total number of people insured in the individual market across the U.S. rose from 4.5 percent to 5.5 percent.

The decline in the number of people enrolled in individual insurance plans, the authors say, is “attributable largely to a steep increase in premiums” because of the state’s regulations. Parente and Bragdon estimate that repealing guaranteed issue and community rating could reduce the price of individual coverage by 42 percent.

This is something for progressive opponents of the individual mandate to bear in mind. You need the mandate to counter the adverse selection which gave those results.

Suderman, an opponent of the proposed national reform, points out that Massachusetts, which has a mandate, has seen premiums rise too. In this post, he doesn’t go into whether the cost-control experiments that the Senate bill proposes, and which Massachusetts didn’t try, are likely to work. CBO notwithstanding, I’m betting that healthcare reform along Senate lines will indeed raise premiums and the budget deficit–but will also point up methods for bending the curve with subsequent initiatives and maybe further legislation. Right now, I believe, that’s the best that can be done–and good enough. But the individual mandate needs to be watched: dropping it, or riddling it with loopholes, really does threaten the whole enterprise.

Clive Crook’s blog

This blog is no longer updated but it remains open as an archive.

I have been the FT's Washington columnist since April 2007. I moved from Britain to the US in 2005 to write for the Atlantic Monthly and the National Journal after 20 years working at the Economist, most recently as deputy editor. I write mainly about the intersection of politics and economics.

Clive Crook’s blog: A guide

Comment: To comment, please register with FT.com. Register for free here. Please also read the FT's comments policy here.
Time: UK time is shown on Clive's posts.
Follow the blog: Links to the Twitter and RSS feeds are at the top of the blog.
Schedule: Clive's column appears in the FT on Mondays and you can read an excerpt of it on this blog.
FT blogs: See the full range of the FT's blogs here.


« Nov Jan »December 2009