Further reading

The fable of Emanuel the Great. David Broder, Washington Post. Broder quarrels with Dana Milbank’s view–”a remarkable fiction”, he calls it–that Rahm Emanuel is the only voice of reason in the White House.

It’s Emanuel who’s dangerous to the presidency. Katrina vanden Heuvel, Washington Post. She goes further in repudiating Milbank, reviving the previous line that Emanuel is the problem. Interesting to see that the Post now has all bases covered. Her reasoning, though, is hard to follow. She blames Emanuel for masterminding the elections of 2006 and turning so many seats Democratic. That sapped the party’s progressive resolve. Maintaining that resolve, even if it means losing elections, is apparently the main thing. Republicans endorse this analysis. I think I know what Emanuel would call it. (I could never endorse such incivility.)

Ed Luce interviews Richard Holbrooke. FT. Holbrooke’s assessment of prospects in Afghanistan is not exactly upbeat.

Clive Crook’s blog

This blog is no longer updated but it remains open as an archive.

I have been the FT's Washington columnist since April 2007. I moved from Britain to the US in 2005 to write for the Atlantic Monthly and the National Journal after 20 years working at the Economist, most recently as deputy editor. I write mainly about the intersection of politics and economics.

Clive Crook’s blog: A guide

Comment: To comment, please register with FT.com. Register for free here. Please also read the FT's comments policy here.
Time: UK time is shown on Clive's posts.
Follow the blog: Links to the Twitter and RSS feeds are at the top of the blog.
Schedule: Clive's column appears in the FT on Mondays and you can read an excerpt of it on this blog.
FT blogs: See the full range of the FT's blogs here.


« Feb Apr »March 2010