Back to Economists' Forum homepageNobody would want to start from here, least of all the bankers. A dearth of capital, worsening loan books and a lack of funding are a horrible combination. It is little wonder they are now as desperate not to lend as they were so recently to lend. Unfortunately, if banks stopped lending, they would create a depression from which everybody, including banks, would suffer. The economy cannot go “cold turkey”. A flow of net lending must be sustained.The starting point for any analysis must be with some harsh realities.
The first is that banks enjoy a state-supported licence to create money. No strictly private business can make a credible promise to do that. Banking is a utility in which taxpayers bear much risk. Regulators have to represent the interests of these risk-bearers of last resort.
The remainder of the article can be read here. Discussion from our forum members and contributors appears below.
Leading economists discuss topics raised by 
Award-winning FT writers and some of the world’s top political and business figures examine the far-reaching implications of the credit crunch on our investment system in our special series on the 
News, data and opinions on market-moving economics. Read posts from Chris Giles, the FT's economics editor, Krishna Guha, US economics editor and Ralph Atkins, Frankfurt bureau chief.