Central banks must time a ‘good exit’

by Randall Kroszner

Pinn illustration

Leaving a financial crisis is like leaving an awkward social gathering: a good exit is essential. In 1936-37, the Federal Reserve made a colossal mistake in its “exit strategy”. This time round it is crucial that central banks get their timing right.

Seventy-three years ago, fearing the large accumulation of reserves held by the banks at the Fed could result in an “uncontrollable expansion of credit in the future” if the banks decided to lend out those reserves, the Fed raised reserve requirements to absorb them. This sharp tightening of monetary policy stopped the robust recovery that had been in train since 1933, precipitating a “double-dip” contraction in 1937-38, which according to Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz in their 1963 book A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960 “was one of the sharpest on record”.

Today, there is much concern about the inflation potential of the roughly $700bn (€494bn, £425bn) accumulation of excess reserves on the Fed’s balance sheet as well as excess reserves on many other central banks’ balance sheets. Central banks must not repeat the premature “exit” mistake of 1936-37.

The remainder of the article can be read here. Debate from our panel of economists appears below.

Economists' Forum

Debating economics

About this blog Blog guide
Read posts on economics from guest contributors to the FT and share your views. Martin Wolf, the FT's chief economics commentator, often joins the debate.


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact martin.wolf@ft.com about the Economists' Forum.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Archive

« Jul Sep »August 2009
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31