Monthly Archives: September 2009

By Michael Pomerleano

I was in Chicago last week to participate in the 12th Annual International Banking Conference sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the World Bank. The answer to the question posed — have the rules of the global financial game really changed? — is a resounding no.

This was my first week back in the US after being away for three years, and the conference gave me an opportunity to gauge the state of the debate there. Compared to my two years at the Bank of International Settlements in Basel and my year at the Bank of Israel, the openness of the debate and the quality of the discussions in Chicago were refreshing. However, in the US — the epicentre of the crisis and the country that is supposed to lead the world toward reform and out of the crisis — I expected a far more forceful articulation of remedial measures.

Pinn illustration

The FT has a new series on the future of investment. But what, I wonder, is the future of finance itself? Who is confident that the financial system now emerging from the crisis is safer, or better at servicing the public’s needs, than the one that went into it? The answer has to be: few people. The question is how to remedy this dire situation.

From the FT:

Martin Wolf: This time will never be different

Mohamed El-Erian: Return of the old ways of thinking threatens recovery

Wolfgang Münchau: A recognition of the deep roots of the crisis

Robert Shiller: In defence of financial innovation

Elsewhere:

Urban Jermann and Vincenzo Quadrini, VOX EU: Paying more attention to financial shocks

Paul Krugman, New York Times: Crowding in

Carlo Bastasin, Peterson Institute: Is It wise or productive for the United States to press germany to abandon Its export-driven economy?

Markus Jäger, VOX EU: Can China be the world’s growth engine?

Has Vince Cable, much-praised Treasury spokesman of the Liberal Democrats and vindicated Jeremiah of the UK’s property bubble, produced a “batty idea”? Even the FT thinks so. But the batty Lib Dem idea is not Mr Cable’s “mansion tax”, but replacing council tax with a local income tax. Taxation of property should be heavier, not lighter. But it should also be less regressive. That is why the mansion tax is the germ of an excellent idea.

By Roman Frydman and Michael D. Goldberg

Confidence seems to be returning to markets almost everywhere, but the debates about what caused the worst crisis since the Great Depression show no sign of letting up. Instead, the spotlight has shifted from bankers, financial engineers and regulators to economists and their theories. This is not a moment too soon. These theories continue to shape the debate about fiscal stimulus, financial reform, and, more broadly, the future of capitalism, which means that they remain a danger to all concerned.

pinn

China has had a good crisis. That became obvious at the “summer Davos” of the World Economic Forum, in Dalian, less than two weeks ago. Chinese confidence was palpable. But so was anxiety. The giant has survived the shock. But its recovery is driven by a surge in credit and fixed investment. In the longer term, China needs to rebalance its economy, by increasing consumption. It is time for the Chinese to enjoy themselves more. How unpleasant can that be?

By Richard Robb

For anyone who was engaged in the financial markets during the week of September 15, 2008, Lehman changed everything. It was obvious. So what could be more tempting to finance professors than to overturn this conventional wisdom? Descartes described the man of letters who takes more pride in his speculations “the more they are removed from common sense,” and so showing that the Lehman collapse was inconsequential has spawned a minor literature.

Ingram Pinn illustration

“If the price of oil stabilises, I believe we can weather the financial crisis at limited cost in terms of real activity.” Thus did Olivier Blanchard, newly appointed head of the International Monetary Fund’s research department, describe the prospects ahead on September 2 2008. He was swiftly proved wrong.

From the FT:

Philip Augar and John McFall: To fix the system we must break up the banks

Clyde Prestowitz: Obama can help free trade with tariffs

Elsewhere:

Peter Thal Larsen, Reuters: Squeeze is on for investment banks

Edwin M Truman, Peterson Institute: Pittsburgh Priorities

Economists’ View: Poverty is up, median income is down

Economists' Forum

Debating economics

About this blog Blog guide
Read posts on economics from guest contributors to the FT and share your views. Martin Wolf, the FT's chief economics commentator, often joins the debate.


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact martin.wolf@ft.com about the Economists' Forum.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Archive

« Aug Oct »September 2009
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930