Monthly Archives: May 2011

By David A. Levy and Srinivas Thiruvadanthai

Take a scary idea that sounds reasonable, repeat it often enough, and people begin to take it as truth. Unfortunately, current beliefs about US Treasury debt and deficits are a prime example of this principle: the US is being scared into seeking exactly the wrong sort of policy.

Many opinion leaders claim: “America is on the road to becoming the next Greece or Ireland,” “The deficit is destroying our children’s future,” or “We need to sharply cut the deficit now before it’s too late.”

All wrong!

By Michael Pomerleano

The international monetary system needs reform. The present system, dominated by reserve holdings of US dollars, places an unsustainable burden of creating reserves on the US.

While the US is privileged, in the short run, to issue a reserve currency, it hinders the productive capacity of the country’s economy in the long run. Recently Joseph Stiglitz, the Columbia University professor and Nobel laureate, proposed a solution, suggesting that the role of special drawing rights should be expanded through new issues and by increasing their use in International Monetary Fund lending. In essence, the Stiglitz proposal aims to move to a world where reserve needs are met by these IMF credits known as SDR allocations rather than by building precautionary reserves.

By James Park

With the demise of Lehman Brothers in 2008 and the subsequent septic shock that stemmed the flow of liquidity in the financial system, the Federal Reserve responded with an unprecedented infusion of liquidity that has continued into this year.

However, this heightened rate of infusion is scheduled to finish in July. With the looming end of the second dose of quantitative easing (QE2) the media has latched onto the analogy of Bill Gross, Pimco’s co-chief investment officer, of QE2 and subsequent liquidity pumping efforts as a Ponzi scheme. The recent exit of Pimco (one of the world’s biggest bond fund managers) from US Treasuries underscores Mr Gross’s huckster metaphor.

While there is an element of warranted alarm, seeing the crisis through the clinical prism of blood composition and stem cells may provide a more balanced view.

By Vivek Dehejia

In a recent essay in the International Herald Tribune (“After the robber barons,” April 14, 2011), I made the case that corruption and inequality were natural byproducts of rapid economic growth in the context of market-based capitalism and a lax regulatory regime.

The corollary is that, left unchecked, rampant corruption and rising wealth and income inequality threaten to delegitimize capitalism itself. This pressure, fuelled by middle class revulsion, gives rise to redistribution and regulatory reform in a democratic polity, regardless of ideological stance.

Economists' Forum

Debating economics

About this blog Blog guide
Read posts on economics from guest contributors to the FT and share your views. Martin Wolf, the FT's chief economics commentator, often joins the debate.


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact martin.wolf@ft.com about the Economists' Forum.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Archive

« Apr Jun »May 2011
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031