On FT Energy Source:
© The Financial Times Ltd 2015 FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
On FT Energy Source:
Many of the UK’s eight old, dirty power plants that signed their death warrant last year by opting out of the EU’s Large Combustion Plant Directive may not survive until their expiry date of 2015, say analysts at Inenco.
The plants (Grain, Ironbridge, Kingsnorth, Didcot, Fawley, Littlebrook, Tilbury and Cockenzie) were all given a maximum of 20,000 hours of life in return for their escaping the expensive facelifts that are making other plants less polluting. The idea was that this amount would let the ‘opt-out’ group live another seven years. But four of them have already used up 6000-8000 of their hours, suggestion they may find eternal rest far sooner. There was a flurry of stories on possible shortages last summer.
The concerns, coupled with price spikes in the wholesale electricity market, arose when the ‘opt out’ plants were doing double time to fill in the supply gap left by those power plants being taken offline while they were busy being upgraded into environmentally friendlier versions of themselves. Unforeseen outages added to the problems.
Since then the story has not been less hot because supply has been steady and the economic downturn has eaten away demand. But it would be a mistake to get complacent now. Read more
A new study by EnSys Energy on the impact of the Waxman-Markey bill on US refiners underlines how hard it is going to be to reduce global warming. That is not the point of the study. The study by the global consulting firm homed in on the fact that investment in US refining capacity could plummet if the bill becomes law because the cost of doing business could soar:
Production at US refineries would drop while production at refineries in countries that do not limit their own greenhouse gas emissions would rise. The impact on global refinery greenhouse gas emissions would be minor as reductions in US emissions mostly would be offset by increases in emissions in other countries.
Not to mention that more emissions would be incurred in importing the foreign-refined products into the US. According to the EnSys study, which was commissioned by the American Petroleum Institute, the industry’s national trade organization, the US would need to increase its imports of petroleum fuels in order to meet as much as nearly one-fifth of US refined product demand in 2030 if the House climate bill becomes law – double what imports would otherwise have been. Read more
Asia hits back on climate change
India and China say West has ‘talked but not done much’ (FT)
US refining may drop by a quarter on climate bill, API says
Climate bill may cause greater dependence on fuel imports (Bloomberg) Read more