The Supreme Court’s decision to consider the appeal of Jeffrey Skilling is giving the former chief executive of Enron a glimmer of hope that his 24-year prison term arising from the collapse of the energy company could be overturned. In 2006, Mr Skilling was convicted of orchestrating the fraud and conspiracy that destroyed the giant energy trader and forced tighter regulatory scrutiny across corporate America.
Mr Skilling’s lawyer, Daniel Petrocelli, has been arguing since then that his client was denied a fair trial because the proceedings were held in Houston, where there was a huge community bias against him. Indeed, it would have been hard to find a jury in this city who was untouched in some way by Enron. A total of 6,000 Enron employees lost jobs in the city, and many more lost money they had invested in the company. Beyond that, everyone seemed to know someone hurt in the downfall.