Certainties from Copenhagen

The climate change negotiations in Copenhagen are just too close to call at present.

Countries were on Thursday night engaged in a frantic last round of discussions as world leaders arrived.

A leaked document from the United Nations appeared to show that the commitments made on greenhouse gas emissions so far were inadequate and would lead to warming of about 3 degrees Celsius, well above what many scientists regard as the limit of safety. The document read: “Unless the remaining gap [between emissions pledges offered and those scientists say are needed] is closed and parties commit themselves to strong action prior and after 2020, global emisions will remain on an unsustainable pathway that could lead to concentrations equal or above 550ppm [parts per million] with the related temperature raise [sic] around 3 degrees.”

That caused a sensation.

But in the midst of the myriad uncertainties and confusions at these talks, there are a few absolute certainties.

One is that if there is a deal, no matter how strong, it will be attacked by most of the big green campaigning groups.

Their argument – and the leaked UN document provides them with more ammunition on this point – is that much deeper emissions cuts will be needed to stave off the worst effects of climate change.

They are likely to be joined by many developing countries, who may denounce a deal as inadequate even if they sign it.

Another certainty is that even a weak deal will be hailed as a huge success by the developed countries and the UN.

And it is almost certain that these talks will go on very late tomorrow night.

Energy Source is no longer updated but it remains open as an archive.

Insight into the financial, economic and policy aspects of energy and the environment.

Read our farewell note

About the blog

Archive

« Nov Jan »December 2009
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031