Supply crunch alarm – oh, no, wait…

The IEA writes that its monthly report “may provide food for thought in the optimists‐versus‐pessimists debate about supply prospects”.  They’re talking of course about the worries of a short- to medium-term supply crunch as investment falls due to the recession.

In a special feature, they point to data from IHS CERA and the US Department of Labor Statistics that show upstream costs falling:

Aggregate upstream capital costs, they say, fell 12 per cent year-on-year to November 2009. They point out that this is a positive figure against signs of upstream investment falling; a Barclays report published in December put the decline at 15 per cent. If companies are spending less, but costs are also falling at a not dissimilar rate, then perhaps supply crunch fears won’t be fully realised. Of the Barclays study, they add:

A key finding is that while National Oil Companies (NOCs) plan to hike their upstream investments by 15% in 2010, International Oil Companies (IOCs) will only spend 1% more – a
reflection in part of opportunity constraints borne of limited access to major new sources of reserves.

Whew. We haven’t seen that particular report, but that’s quite a striking difference. No wonder non-Opec supply is peaking.

Related links:

Finding new oil gets ever more expensive (FT Energy Source, 23/09/09)
Not your average peak oil theory, from Macquarie (FT Energy Source, 18/09/09)
IEA puts a number on supply crunch: Three years to go (FT Energy Source, (20/05/09)

Energy Source is no longer updated but it remains open as an archive.

Insight into the financial, economic and policy aspects of energy and the environment.

Read our farewell note

About the blog

Archive

« Dec Feb »January 2010
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031