This week’s second report on the infamous “climategate” controversy came out with a bang on Wednesday afternoon.
The £200,000 review, headed by ex-civil servant Sir Muir Russell, was into the emails hacked last November from the University of East Anglia, and which purported to show that climate scientists at the university were conspiring to distort conclusions, conceal data and subvert the peer review process.
Except that they didn’t, according to the Russell review. His committee found: “On the specific allegations made against the behaviour of [UEA] Climatic Research Unit scientists, we find that their rigour and honesty as scientists are not in doubt.”
Further, “we did not find any evidence of behaviour that might undermine the conclusions of the IPCC assessments”.
CRU scientists were also accused of withholding crucial temperature data. This they did not, said Sir Muir.






