Republican Mitt Romney’s pick of Paul Ryan as running mate for November’s US presidential election has catapulted Medicare to the top of the agenda (along with his budget plan).
Already the attack ads have boiled down the essence of the campaign: Ryan wants to push granny off a cliff by handing Medicare budgets to states and turning the medical support for the elderly into a voucher scheme. The Romney response is to attack “Obamacare”, pointing out the scale of cuts to Medicare made by the president in order to fund a wider healthcare scheme.
As usual in politics, neither is addressing the real question: why is American healthcare such poor value for money?
This is best shown by just one amazing statistic: the US government spends a bigger chunk of GDP on health than the British government – which gets a nationwide healthcare system for it. Americans only get care for the elderly (Medicare) and the poor (Medicaid). Read more





James Mackintosh is the Financial Times' Investment Editor, writing and presenting the daily Short View column and video. In 16 years at the FT his posts have included comment editor, motor industry editor and hedge funds correspondent, as well as spells in the Parliamentary lobby and Paris. He was the first reporter hired for FT.com, joining two weeks before it launched.
John Authers is the Financial Times' Senior Investment Columnist, writing the Saturday Long View and a regular Monday column. In a 22-year career at the FT, his previous posts have included global head of the Lex column, investment editor, US markets editor, Mexico City bureau chief and US banking correspondent. His latest book is The Fearful Rise of Markets.