Google and the heavy lifting of search

fireworks.jpgThere was a distinct lack of fireworks at the ”factory tour” that Google put on today to show off its search prowess. More than anything else, what came across (and what always comes across when Google engineers take the stage) is that making search work really well is difficult.

Most of the time was taken up with incremental improvements in two of the most promising areas: local search and “universal” search. These are not new, but they have the potential to greatly enhance the relevance and range of material returned by regular Web searches.

When I had a moment to talk to Marissa Mayer, vice president of search products and user experience, she concurred that most advances in quality are largely invisible to the average user, though an occasional eye-grabbing feature – such as the video links returned in universal search results – are more noticeable.

According to Mayer, around 30 per cent of Google’s search results presently fall into the “universal” category (meaning that they draw on a search of seven different sources – videos, maps, news, books, images, products and blogs.) That proportion will grow as Google works out how to return relevant blended results from these different sources for more types of query, she added.

Universal search has been talked of as the Holy Grail of the business, drawing on all types and sources of information to deliver the most relevant result. Yet to judge from what Mayer says, the real “killer app” of universal search has yet to be seen. This will come from extending search to social networks and drawing in information that is deeply personal to the user and their network of friends and contacts.

Footnote: What fireworks there were today came with the formal  launch of Google Health, a service for storing personal health records online (limited for now to the US.) This is a project that has attracted an inordinate amount of attention in the time it has been under development, but it is still hard to see it as a mainstream service for some time. Few health records exist in digital form, and while it sounds a nice idea in principle, there seem to be few incentives for now for most doctors or patients to change their behaviour.

Tech analysis and reviews

Netiquette at work

The new tech rules for office communication

From rpm to bits

Converting vinyl and other old formats to digital

FT techfeed

Archive

« Apr Jun »May 2008
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Tags

Alibaba Amazon android anonymous AOL apple BlackBerry ebay Facebook google Google TV groupon hacking hewlett-packard HP htc intel ios iPad iphone IPO kindle fire Lenovo microsoft Mobile Motorola Netflix nokia patents PayPal privacy RIM samsung smartphones social media Sony Spotify Steve Jobs story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter windows 8 Yahoo Zynga

FT Tech Hub

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.

The blog includes a separate section on personal technology.

Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.