Why Google should heed the DoJ’s wake-up call

Can Yahoo be serious? In its statement today on the collapse of its search alliance with Google, Yahoo said it was “disappointed that Google has elected to withdraw from the agreement rather than defend it in court.”

So let’s get this straight: Yahoo expects Google to go to war with the US government? And over a deal that meant very little at all to its bottom line?

Maybe it’s no surprise that Yahoo would want to fight to the end. It hasn’t got much to lose. But Google needs to wise up and be more careful about how it throws its weight around. Walking away from this alliance is the first sign that it understands what’s really at stake.

The arrangement always smacked of Google at its worst: a combination of naive insouciance and thinly-veiled scheming.

The insouciance was shown by Sergey Brin, who earlier this year blithely told a group of reporters (including this one) that the alliance was all about helping out old friends. After all, Yahoo’s Jerry Yang and David Filo had lent the Google founders a hand when they were just starting out, and anyway, their companies’ cultures were very similar.

The scheming was the obvious ulterior motive here, to block Microsoft. Asked about how they set corporate strategy, Google executives always deny they have such thoughts: everything they do is for the benefit of customers. But this partnership betrayed one of Google’s most powerful psychoses, its paranoia about Microsoft.

For the sake of its shareholders, Google really needs to move beyond this sort of badly handled, calculating manoeuvre.

In a blog note today, David Drummond, Google’s top lawyer, said that getting into a long legal battle would have been like “trying to drive down the road of innovation with the parking brake on.” True. But it was Google that let its eyes wander from the road in the first place.

The good news for Google and its shareholders is that it pulled out of this one before it was too late. The bad news is that the Department of Justice has been put on alert, and Google certainly can’t expect the benefit of the doubt next time around. It’s time to stamp on the accelerator and leave Yahoo in the rear-view mirror.

Tech analysis and reviews

Netiquette at work

The new tech rules for office communication

From rpm to bits

Converting vinyl and other old formats to digital

FT techfeed

Archive

« Oct Dec »November 2008
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Tags

Acer Alibaba Amazon android anonymous AOL apple BlackBerry ebay Facebook google Google TV groupon hacking hewlett-packard HP htc intel ios iPad iphone IPO kindle fire Lenovo microsoft Motorola Netflix nokia patents PayPal privacy RIM samsung smartphones social media Sony Spotify Steve Jobs story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter windows 8 Yahoo Zynga

FT Tech Hub

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.

The blog includes a separate section on personal technology.

Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.