Dirty washing

On February 3 Motorola, the struggling US-based mobile phone maker, announced a $3.6bn fourth quarter loss and took the opportunity to reveal that Paul Liska, the company’s chief financial officer had left the company after less than a year in the job.

When analysts questioned Greg Brown, Motorola’s chief executive, during a conference call about the reasons for Mr Liska’s departure, Mr Brown chose his words carefully but indicated that it related to the company’s decision to postpone the planned spin-off of its loss-making mobile phone business.

“As it relates to Paul, I do want to say, he did a lot of good work here and helped us get a lot of the heavy lifting done around this separation and preparation for separation,” said the Motorola CEO. “That said, I think the business environment’s changed and given the environmental changes, we thought the change was appropriate at this time.”

Just over two weeks later however, the relationship between Motorola and Mr Liska, a former finance chief of Sears, Roebuck, had soured with both sides trading increasingly acrimonious charges in the Chicago courts.

Court filings show that on February 19, after analysing the events leading to Mr Liska’s departure, Motorola officials decided to terminate him ‘for cause’ due to “serious misconduct and incompetence.”

The following day Mr Liska  filed a ‘retaliatory discharge’ or ‘whistleblower’suit against the company which he accused of firing him because he had questioned financial projections for the company’s mobile-devices unit.

The Schaumburg, Illinois-based company responded to the court filing in a statement to the Chicago Tribune describing Mr Liska as a “treacherous officer” who connived to “scheme designed to portray himself as a whistleblower and demand millions in return for his silence.” In court papers, the company said he was dismissed for “his extortionate scheme to enrich himself.”

Now Motorola has asked an Illinois judge to punish Mr Liska, for allegedly destroying evidence on a laptop computer. In papers filed with Judge Allen Goldberg in Chicago, lawyers for the company accused Mr Liska of deleting and destroyed documents on the computer before returning it to the company. The Judge is due to hear arguments in the case on April 29. In the meantime, Motorola and Mr Liska’s lawyer declined to comment.

Tech analysis and reviews

Netiquette at work

The new tech rules for office communication

From rpm to bits

Converting vinyl and other old formats to digital

FT techfeed

Archive

« Mar May »April 2009
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Tags

Alibaba Amazon amazon tablet android anonymous AOL apple BlackBerry ebay Facebook google Google TV groupon hacking hewlett-packard HP htc intel ios iPad iphone kindle fire Lenovo microsoft Mobile Motorola Netflix nokia patents PayPal privacy RIM samsung smartphones social media Sony Spotify Steve Jobs story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter windows 8 Yahoo Zynga

FT Tech Hub

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.

The blog includes a separate section on personal technology.

Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.