Larry Ellison’s Plan A: Buy only Sun’s software assets

Speculation about a possible spin-off of Sun’s hardware business by Oracle may not be so wide of the mark after all. The reason: Oracle’s initial acquisition interest only extended to some of Sun’s software assets.

Also, HP spent months doing due diligence over a possible bid of its own but backed out at the last minute without ever submitting an offer, so there’s a chance of it emerging as a buyer should Oracle opt to shed any parts of Sun in future.

Those are some of the things to be gleaned from Sun’s detailed disclosure to the SEC today of the events leading up to its deal with Oracle (HP’s identity is not disclosed – it is mentioned in the filing only as “Party B”. But one person who had a ringside seat to the action has told us that HP was actively engaged for months, and that despite widespread speculation, Cisco never showed any serious interest.)

The last-minute nature of Oracle’s bid for Sun in mid-April has received plenty of attention. The sheer speed with which it moved on the final weekend left IBM looking very flat-footed.

But what’s clear now is that this was not Larry Ellison’s preferred route. Back in mid-March he proposed buying what Sun describes as “certain of our software assets,” along with taking a minority equity stake. That idea was rejected.

When he finally bought the whole company, Mr Ellison gave two justifications. One was that he wanted to get his hands on Java, Solaris and some of Sun’s other software. The other was that owning the hardware division as well would leave Oracle better placed, as a vertically integrated company, to deal with the way many enterprise customers will want to buy their technology in future.

Based on the new information today, the “vertical integration” argument sounds increasingly opportunistic. Of course, Mr Ellison has since said he is “definitely not going to exit the hardware business,” but such declarations of intent often have a habit of changing as circumstances, and strategic objectives, shift.

As for HP: In the only explanation given for its lack of a firm offer, Sun says of the discussions late last year that “pursuing a transaction in the near term was not optimal for Party B at that time.” That isn’t surprising. Mark Hurd has a lot riding on successfully integrating the EDS acquisition. Attempting a second big consolidation play at the same time, in servers, would be a risk.

All of this suggests that, at some point, a deal between HP and Oracle for some of Sun’s assets could make sense. But for now, both companies are likely to keep their heads down as they focus on the immediate integration work at hand.

Tech analysis and reviews

Netiquette at work

The new tech rules for office communication

From rpm to bits

Converting vinyl and other old formats to digital

FT techfeed

Archive

« Apr Jun »May 2009
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Alibaba Amazon android anonymous AOL apple BlackBerry ebay Facebook google Google TV groupon hacking hewlett-packard HP htc intel ios iPad iphone kindle fire Lenovo microsoft Mobile Motorola Netflix nokia patents PayPal privacy RIM samsung smartphones social media Sony Spotify Steve Jobs story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter Walmart windows 8 Yahoo Zynga

FT Tech Hub

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.

The blog includes a separate section on personal technology.

Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.