Does 2 + 3 = Trouble?

With advertisers like Martin Sorrell lining up to welcome Wednesday’s Microsoft/ Yahoo search pact, it might seem churlish for regulators to take a long hard look at the alliance. But that is exactly what they’re going to do – and there’s certainly no assurance that the deal will get the green light.

The babyfood business in the US provides the biggest warning sign. Back in 2000, Gerber controlled around two thirds of the US market for jarred babyfood – not that different from Google’s 77 per cent share of US search advertising, according to Microsoft’s figures.

But when the second and third players in the market, Heinz and Beech-Nut, tried to get together, the Federal Trade Commission had something to say about it. The regulators sued to block the deal and, after losing in a lower court, won on appeal. If that precedent looms large in the US, Microsoft faces the added hurdle in Europe of a regulator that has already shown itself ready and willing to fight.

When I put this to Brad Smith, Microsoft’s general counsel, he had this to say:

This is really about going from one to two when it comes to having long-term sustainable competition in the search marketplace. Neither Microsoft nor Yahoo alone could look at a future over the next decade with the kind of ability for sustained profitable competition that this now gives us the opportunity to create.

A second consideration that Microsoft is likely to lean on is the broader aggressive competition with Google. Smith again:

The biggest concern that anti-trust authorities have had in markets where there are two competitors is that there might be collusion between those two. In the leading US cases, that has been a concern. I don’t know of anyone who thinks there is any possibility that Microsoft and Google would collude about anything. We are obviously in a very competitive market across the board and we are going to continue in that dynamic.

Will these arguments carry the day over the Gerber principle?

Microsoft may find sympathy hard to come by. It has the resources to keep fighting for a long time in this market, and has already demonstrated its tenacity.

At least this time around Microsoft won’t have to face the all-out hostility it saw from Google when attempting a full acquisition of Yahoo last year. Google would be hard-pressed to argue against a deal that looks very similar – only much smaller – to the one it tried to reach with Yahoo itself last year, and which it still stands by publicly. But you can rest assured it will be doing everything it can behind the scenes to put a spanner in the works.

Tech analysis and reviews

Netiquette at work

The new tech rules for office communication

From rpm to bits

Converting vinyl and other old formats to digital

FT techfeed

Archive

« Jun Aug »July 2009
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Acer Alibaba Amazon android anonymous AOL apple BlackBerry ebay Facebook google Google TV groupon hacking hewlett-packard HP htc intel ios iPad iphone IPO kindle fire Lenovo microsoft Motorola Netflix nokia patents PayPal privacy RIM samsung smartphones social media Sony Spotify Steve Jobs story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter windows 8 Yahoo Zynga

FT Tech Hub

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.

The blog includes a separate section on personal technology.

Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.