Google Phone is no iPhone

The “Google Phone” is real, judging by the multitude of photos available and tweets by lucky staff recipients, but why is it necessary?

Does Google want to change the cellphone industry? Is it worried that Android adoption will stall? I would say no on both counts. The Google phone is necessary because the company feels an Apple-like need to control the user experience.

We have seen this from Google already in its introduction of the Chrome browser and announcement of the Chrome operating system. Both were created to load web pages and applications faster and make them more central to the user experience, thereby benefiting Google’s search-advertising cash cow.

Google also likes end-to-end control of its own processes. It has made its own hardware for its search business – it thinks it knows best in putting together the servers that process search queries.

Google, like Apple, feels it has the ability to deliver its own complete and distinctive service to users. But while Apple has never licensed its iPhone operating system and interface to any other handset makers, Google has done so from the start with Android.

Google’s move into the territory of handset makers will not therefore cause the same alarm as the iPhone did. But it will still make phone makers investing in Android feel that the playing field is no longer level, with the Google Phone being optimised for the latest improvements in Android.

At least there is no suggestion that the Google Phone will be free, unlike other disruptive services, from Google Analytics to Google Voice.

According to a Reuters report that appears to be sourced from Deutsche Telekom, Google will sell its phone at a subsidised price through T-Mobile from next month, with the usual two-year contract.

It looks very appealing from the photos and specifications reported – similar to HTC’s HD2 Windows Mobile phone, with a 1GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor and large screen. But it will be one of a growing number of Android phones and not a game-changer in any sense.

Ashok Kumar, NorthEast Securities analyst, does not see it as a one-off – there will be a series of Google phones, as well as a Google netbook running Chrome, he says.

That would make sense too, especially to a company of Google’s relentless logic.

Tech analysis and reviews

Netiquette at work

The new tech rules for office communication

From rpm to bits

Converting vinyl and other old formats to digital

FT techfeed

Archive

« Nov Jan »December 2009
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Tags

Acer Alibaba Amazon android anonymous AOL apple BlackBerry ebay Facebook google Google TV groupon hacking hewlett-packard HP htc intel ios iPad iphone kindle fire Lenovo microsoft Mobile Motorola Netflix nokia patents PayPal privacy RIM samsung smartphones social media Sony Spotify Steve Jobs story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter windows 8 Yahoo Zynga

FT Tech Hub

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.

The blog includes a separate section on personal technology.

Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.