Friday May 16 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

December 3, 2007

Chatham House/Las Vegas rules

Last week, I attended an interesting event hosted by Time Warner at its headquarters in New York. It involved John Edwards, the Democrat candidate for the presidency, being interviewed by Dick Parsons, Time Warner’s chairman and chief executive, in front of an small-ish invited audience. It was one of a series of events called "Conversations in the Circle".

I cannot recount what Mr Parsons or Mr Edwards said (although neither said anything controversial) because the meeting was held under what Jeff Bewkes, Time Warner’s president, described as Chatham House rules. Mr Bewkes explained half-jokingly that this meant: "What’s said in the circle stays in the circle".

In fact, aficionados will recognise that those are not Chatham House but Las Vegas rules.

The Chatham House rule, as devised for meetings held at the eponymous London policy centre on international affairs, states that:

When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identify nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.

Las Vegas rules, meanwhile, reputedly state that "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas". This means, roughly, that if you go to the Nevada city in a group of friends to gamble, drink, watch a Cirque du Soleil performance having taken magic mushrooms, or visit a lap dancing club, none of it must be recounted afterwards.

Thus, under the Chatham House rule, if you were in a group of 15 men, one of whom did an embarrassing thing in Las Vegas, it would be acceptable to say afterwards that one of the party had done it, but not to say who it was. Under Las Vegas rules, you ought to say nothing at all.

I suppose Mr Bewkes was right, in this case, that the Chatham House rule was in effect the same as Las Vegas rules because it would have been impossible to repeat anything that was said during the evening without identifying who had said it. But there is a distinction.

Post a comment

Comment Policy




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business