January 30, 2008
The crazy world of the superstar
My column in the Financial Times this week compares Jérôme Kerviel of Société Générale with Tom Cruise. Yes, seriously. You can read it here and comment below.
My column in the Financial Times this week compares Jérôme Kerviel of Société Générale with Tom Cruise. Yes, seriously. You can read it here and comment below.
this problem has been around for ages - in economics it is called the agent problem: people are effectively paid to act in interests very different to the owners of the business. it happens every day, just not on a grand scale. until society changes its value system this will continue
Posted by: eric savage | January 31st, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Report this commentThere is a reason why someone holding a supervisory position earns even more than the rainmakers–the duty to both always know what the underlings are up to and to a large extent know how to do it himself, too.
When the powers-that-be are either incompetent or unaware/indifferent–content with knowing that money is coming in–that is when banking becomes nothing more than a car dealership. And considering the sums involved, disaster is but a matter of time and magnitude.
Co-existing negligence in two parties does not make a conspiracy–in the absence of which Mr Kerviel’s responsibility for exceeding his authority and its consequences is undiminished by his supervisors’ responsibility for their own incompetence and/or negligence. Each one is guilty of breach of trust.
The bank’s shareholders are right in filing charges against the two parties, albeit separately. Those in other hitherto-spared banks are duty-bound to check if their middle-managers are doing their jobs.
Posted by: J Michael, private banker, 39 | February 1st, 2008 at 5:09 am | Report this commentWhile as much avuncular as uncompromising towards the market stars under my wing, I would be the last one to make excuses for the likes of Messrs Kerviel, Leeson, Hamanaka, Rusnak and Young.
Nonetheless, I found the comparison needlessly cruel–a rogue trader deserves handcuffs, but an anti-depressant-condemning spiritual-powers-flaunting couch-jumper needs to be taken away in a straitjacket.
Posted by: J Michael, private banker, 39 | February 1st, 2008 at 5:23 am | Report this comment