Why the U-turn is a high-risk tactic

July 23, 2008

franz-humer.jpg

My FT column this week is about Roche’s offer to buy the stake in Genentech it does not already own. I believe it is taking risks with its reputation and the value that it has gained from Genentec. It starts as follows:

One of the entertaining things about business is that executives must sometimes, in the interests of their shareholders, say one thing for years and then reverse themselves and declare the opposite.

This can involve double-crossing, or at least angering, those who believed the original story. So it goes.

It often happens when a big company takes over a small one. At first, the acquirer insists that its new subsidiary will be left alone and its managers will be free to carry on as before without interference from head office. Then, one day, the long leash becomes a short one.

The question is not whether this is bad behaviour – in fact, it is life – but whether it is wise. Will those who work at the subsidiary be so annoyed that they walk out, leaving little behind? Or will the U-turn work?

You can read the rest here and comment below.

One Response to “Why the U-turn is a high-risk tactic”

Comments

  1. Several points to note

    1) The two parties concerned have been, sts, living together now for many years. Probably Roche’s offer has a LOT to do with the weak dollar, and if the dollar goes up - well, the offer might be allowed to expire or taken off the table (Yahoo story). Maybe - after the directors’ panel reports back on the Roche offer - there will be a few more $$$ on offer. But as Roche holds 56% it’s unrealistic to expect a counter-offer from anywhere else.

    2) In the last decade or so there has been a BIG change in Swiss-German corporate mentality -
    a new generation is running the show here, and Roche has a new CEO (Severin Schwan - Austrian).

    Google has a big presence in Zürich, employs ca. 300 people working in a very informal atmosphere, got a positive writeup with pictures in the “Tages Anzeiger” this year. Mother breast-feeding baby, deep comfy armchairs in the “library”, round-the-clock snacks, frayed jeans, many different nationalities on the payroll… In the end it’s results that count but imo for Roche that probably means today Nobel prizes, and the top & bottom lines will look after themselves?

    3) Roche is also going for small deals (in the
    $$$ hundreds of millions). Already in July so so far it bought Mirus (?) in Wisconsin and announced the purchase of a Canadian bio-tech a couple of days ago.

    Posted by: J.J. | July 24th, 2008 at 9:33 am | Report this comment

Post a comment




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.

More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Gadget GuruThe FT's personal technology expert Paul Taylor answers your gadgetry questions

  • Margaret McCartney's blogA forum by GP and FT opinion columnist on healthcare issues

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business

  • Editors' blogAn insight into the content and production of the Financial Times, written by the decision-makers