Monthly Archives: February 2011

This week, the political upheaval in the Middle East spread to Libya, and therefore really began to hit the the oil market for the first time. Oil prices briefly hit levels which were 50 per cent above the average levels of last summer – which, if maintained, would represent a medium sized oil shock. Yet global equities suffered nothing more than a minor dent, and global bonds rallied markedly.

Elsewhere, the US Congress failed to make progress towards an agreement on raising the public debt ceiling. A permanent stand-off in Congress may be only a remote prospect, but it would be a catastrophic event for the world economy if it happened.

When the first estimate of UK GDP in 2010 Q4 showed a fall of 0.5 per cent, I commented in this blog that this news was “too bad to be true”. The second estimate for Q4 came out this morning and, sure enough, the figures were – worse. Undaunted, I am still strongly of the view that this depressing quarter does not give an accurate reading on the true state of the UK economy at present. Most other information points to a continuation of reasonably healthy growth in recent months, and a strong bounce-back in the official GDP number is still to be expected in Q1.

Each of the last five major downturns in global economic activity has been immediately preceded by a major spike in oil prices. Sometimes (e.g. in the 1970s and in 1990), the surge in oil prices has been due to supply restrictions, triggered by Opec or by war in the Middle East. Other times (e.g. in 2008), it has been due to rapid growth in the demand for oil.

But in both cases the contractionary effects of higher energy prices have eventually proven too much for the world economy to shrug off. With the global average price of oil having moved above $100 per barrel in recent days – about 33 per cent higher than the price last summer – it is natural to fear that this latest oil shock may be enough to kill the global economic recovery. But oil prices would have to rise much further, and persist for much longer, for these fears to be justified.

Apart from the continuing political instability in the Middle East, the most important macro events of the week were focused on inflation. We have known for a while that headline inflation is now rising, especially in the emerging world, because of the increases in food and energy prices. Now it appears that core inflation is also rising, despite the very large output gaps in most developed economies. Central bankers are now seriously split on whether to tighten policy, but the majority view still seems to be dovish.

The US unemployment rate has dropped from 9.8 per cent to 9.0 per cent in the last two months, and there have been signs that private sector employment may soon be rising at about 200,000 per month. Admittedly, this improvement is still a very minor one compared to the massive deterioration in employment which occurred in 2008-09, when 8.5 m jobs were lost in the economy. But at least the change is now in the right direction. (See this earlier blog.)

With the labour market beginning to improve, some members of the FOMC are contemplating an early tightening in monetary policy. Indeed, the markets now expect the Fed to raise short term interest rates by 1 per cent in the next 18 months. If this goes much further, it could undermine the strength of risk assets, and possibly also of the economy itself. So it is crucial to ask whether there really is  a genuine case for the Fed to become concerned about the tightening of the labour market.

China’s GDP growth made news this week because, on the official figures, China overtook Japan to become the second largest economy in the world in 2010. But actually, on a different way of calculating the data, this was very old news. Using purchasing power parity, China not only overtook Japan way back in 2001, but it is also quite close to overtaking the US as the biggest economy in the world – if, indeed, it has not done so already.

GDP statistics measure the amount of value added or income in the economy, measured in domestic currencies, over a given period of time. But it is more difficult to compare the GDP in one economy (China) with that in another economy (Japan), because we need to use an exchange rate which translates yuan into yen or vice versa. This is not as straightforward as it may seem.

This week in global macro, the emerging markets reminded us that they are, well, emerging markets. The Egyptian crisis may have moved towards resolution, but there are risks of contagion elsewhere in the region. India continues to be the worst performing stock market of the year, and China is slowing under the weight of tightening monetary policy.

Developed equity markets continue to out-perform, although headline inflation is rising, notably in the UK. Although many people are claiming that the Bank of England is losing credibility, that is not yet showing in the gilt market. In the US, there were some signs of greater hawkishness from certain members of the FOMC, but none where it really counts – which is in the minds of Ben Bernanke and his senior lieutenants. The US equity market ended the week at its highest level since June 2008.

When the Queen asked asked an academic at the LSE why the economics profession had failed to predict the credit crunch, she raised a topic which continues to resonate. In fact, the IMF’s watchdog criticised the organisation on exactly those grounds yesterday. Although many answers have been given to Her Majesty’s question, I suspect that none of them has really settled the issue. Her question is disarmingly simple, but the answer is not.

The latest academic attempt to tackle the question is this piece by Raghuram Rajan. He is well qualified to write on the matter, having delivered a very perceptive warning about a possible crisis to the entire senior cast of global central banking at Jackson Hole in 2005. They politely ignored him. Prof Rajan now argues that economists had all of the models required to understand the credit crisis, but that the subject suffers from being segregated into increasingly narrow fields. It therefore lacks people with the broad overall view necessary to connect all of the diverse strands. This is indeed a problem, but it may not be the whole answer to the Queen’s question.

This week, the dramatic events in Egypt failed to unsettle the global financial markets. Not only do investors believe that Egypt itself is not critical for global oil prices, they also seem to believe that there will be relatively little contagion to the more important oil producing states elsewhere in the Middle East. This is a fragile assumption, even if it is more likely to be right than wrong (see this earlier blog). The markets have also been impressed by the increasingly obvious strength of the global economic recovery. But the head of the IMF believes that we may be repeating the mistakes of the past, and that the recovery may be built on shaky foundations. This warning was almost entirely ignored.

The US employment figures for January need more interpretation than usual, because adverse weather effects, benchmark revisions to past data, and changes to population estimates have all come together this month to cloud the picture.

Furthermore, the unemployment figures are currently telling a very different story from the employment figures, which needs explaining. Having examined all the data, my own interpretation is that the underlying state of the labour market is definitely improving, and is probably improving at a slightly faster pace than it was a few months ago.

Gavyn Davies

on macroeconomics

About this blog About Gavyn Blog guide
A blog on macroeconomics, economic policymaking and the financial markets. Gavyn usually writes about a key topic of the week on Sunday.

Follow Gavyn Davies on the A-List.


Gavyn Davies is a macroeconomist who is now chairman of Fulcrum Asset Management and co-founder of Prisma Capital Partners. He was the head of the global economics department at Goldman Sachs from 1987-2001, and was chairman of the BBC from 2001-2004.

He has also served as an economic policy adviser in No 10 Downing Street, an external adviser to the British Treasury, and as a visiting professor at the London School of Economics.

Gavyn Davies is an active investor and may have financial interests and holdings in any of the topics about which he writes. The views expressed are solely those of Mr Davies and in no way reflect the views of Prisma Capital Partners LP, Fulcrum Asset Management LLP, their respective affiliates or representatives. This material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, investment advice or recommendations. Readers are urged to seek professional advice before making any investments.

To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Archive

« Jan Mar »February 2011
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  

Elsewhere on ft.com

Money Supply

Opinions on central banks around the world

Martin Wolf's Forum

Posts on economics from guest contributors