February 22, 2008
Flipping heck: an unlikely short-termist
Peter Lorange has a double life. On the one hand he is a management theorist and the long-serving president of IMD, the Swiss business school. But he is also a successful businessman. When he popped into the FT yesterday, I was more interested in Lorange the doer rather than Lorange the thinker. I wanted to quiz him on the way he was handling his business affairs in order to get first-hand tips for managing in choppy economic conditions. The affable Norwegian’s responses were not what I expected at all.
For a start, it turned out that he sold his shipping business - which moves supplies to and from oil rigs - last year. With disarming candour, he says he has given half of the deal proceeds to UBS to be placed in relatively low-risk investments. The other half has been earmarked for opportunities chosen by him and family members. In contrast to his patiently-constructed shipping company, these are likely to be shorter-term investments that have a clear potential to be “flipped” after 2-4 years. “That requires new thinking for me,” he says, declaring that he has already had success buying shares during recent stock market dips.
I hadn’t been prepared for such a pillar of the management establishment to be so fervent about flipping. Maybe global economic uncertainty has made other approaches to capital allocation too risky at the moment: a clear path to payback outweighs everything else.
But Professor Lorange, who is due to stand down as IMD president at the start of April, has not entirely ditched his old ways. He is also trying to buy two ships that transport live salmon from farm to slaughterhouse, arguing that they occupy an attractive, highly-specialised niche in an industry he knows well.
As a postcript, Lorange the theorist has two pieces of general advice for those trying to manage and lead in a downturn. The first is to promote team unity by stressing the ”we, we, we” rather than the “me, me, me”. The second is to focus any job cuts on less-promising divisions rather than trying to spread them out in an even-handed way across the organisation.











Lorange puts his money in UBS? Did his investment include sub-prime loans? Ha ha ha!
Posted by: Francis Chin | March 4th, 2008 at 5:32 am | Report this commentI think the dichotomy between Doing and Thinking here reveals the ever-present, underlying British approach to business schools and theory. Yes, there is the slight hint of ‘theory’ (read ‘thinking’) being a w#$k!. Could somebody please tell this nation of shopkeepers that thinking is also a very important managerial activity. Or is Doing without Thinking better?
Posted by: Giorgio | March 7th, 2008 at 11:43 am | Report this commentTouché, Giorgio. What I should have written was that I was more interested in Prof Lorange’s particular experience of doing business in a downturn rather than his broad-brush commentary that day. Journalists often prefer the particular to the general. Can be more vivid.
Your “nation of shopkeepers” dig made me smile. But I’m also curious: why do you assume that shopkeeping is all doing and no thinking? And what does that reveal about the retail industry where you live?!
Posted by: Adam Jones | March 7th, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Report this comment