Friday May 16 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

March 4, 2008

Air miles - legitimate booty?

Should government employees and politicians be allowed to keep the air miles they accrue on official business? No, roar the public-spending puritans. But if they aren’t allowed to keep them, why should business people be allowed to hang on to theirs? Don’t they belong to the shareholders who funded their travel in the first place? Couldn’t they at least be used to fund other corporate travel?

Michael Skapinker probes these ethical questions in today’s FT, concluding that it is a puzzle why people get so exercised by air miles when they are so difficult to use. But I have my own suggestion to add: companies could distribute the air miles accrued by their workers to those small shareholders who bother to show up to their annual meetings.

Given that most of these investors are retired, they have plenty of time on their hands to find ways of actually using the blasted things. And it would be a great spur for shareholder democracy.

One Response to “Air miles - legitimate booty?”

Comments

  1. Confiscating air miles won’t benefit companies - because in the long run, it will cause the air mile programmes to be shut down. Here’s why…

    The reason airlines use airmiles programmes is as a loyalty tool. If you force the recipient of the airmiles to give up the miles (whether to their company/ministry to reduce the cost of their next flight or to shareholders) the recipient loses their loyalty to that airline and in future will simply book the airline with the cheapest flight or best service on the relevant route.

    This would make the airmiles programmes useless to the airlines - what’s the point of a loyalty programme that doesn’t generate loyalty? So they’d withdraw the programmes. Which would, of course take the companies back to square one. No air miles = no cheaper flights for the firm.

    So why expend time and money and piss off your employees, if you won’t see any financial benefit except in the very short-term?

    Posted by: Robbie | March 4th, 2008 at 3:50 pm | Report this comment

Post a comment

Comment Policy



As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business