What begins as an informal, well-intentioned conversation over soft drinks at a London hotel can end a few weeks later in a lonely act of suicide in an Oxfordshire field. That is a melodramatic but not inaccurate summary of the last days of David Kelly’s life.
Dr Kelly, a UK government biological weapons expert, was certainly letting off steam when he spoke to the journalist Andrew Gilligan towards the end of May 2003. He was unhappy at the way in which unreliable information concerning Saddam Hussein’s arsenal of weapons had been presented to the public.
But Dr Kelly, a respected Whitehall figure, was licensed to speak to journalists to provide important background information. He may not even have seen himself as a whistleblower at all. His frankness, however, was explosive, and the consequences devastating. Last week’s sacking of Tony Goode, a Marks and Spencer employee, for gross misconduct – leaking information to the media about proposed changes to the company’s redundancy terms – may seem banal by comparison. But it is an example of the same problem. How do you respond to a colleague who reveals commercial (or other) secrets to the outside world? Why do such whistleblowers exist, and can you avoid creating the circumstances where this sort of unilateral action seems to be the only option left to a disgruntled employee?
Continue reading: ‘How to wipe out whistleblowing’. Please post comments below.


Following the
Older entries

Stefan Stern writes a column on Tuesdays on
Ravi Mattu is the editor of 
Lucy Kellaway writes a column on Mondays on
Luke Johnson writes an FT column on Wednesdays on
Lucy Kellaway, FT columnist and associate editor, offers her solution to your workplace problems in a column in the Financial Times. In the 
