Ecomonics

As I was leaving Italy after Milan Fashion Week, I was chatting to Guglielmo Miani, the young-ish CEO of Larusmiani, a family-owned manufacturer of luxurious materials, when he let drop an interesting fact. Last week the Italian government quietly changed the law it passed in November that banned retail establishments from accepting more than €1,000 in cash. Surprise!

What changed?

Now, retail establishments have no limit on the cash they can accept from foreigners, as long as they take a photocopy of said foreigner’s passport. I’ll say that again: no limit. Italians are still restricted to €1,000.

You know something is up when all the talk runway-side at a fashion show is about how a brand is NOT doing an IPO.

The Facebook listing has tech companies everywhere flirting with Wall Street (latest under discussion: etailer Gilt Group), but Michael Kors’ blockbuster public offering of last year, which saw his company attain a market capitalisation of $6.41bn, has not had the same effect on his fashion peers. Or so the folks at Tory Burch, whose a/w collection bowed this morning, might lead one to believe.

The fashion industry has found itself suffering from some unexpected repercussions since the installment of Mario Monti’s technocratic government, I learned after having lunch with Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana of Dolce & Gabbana.

Though the experience will eventually become — surprise! — a Lunch with the FT, before that is published (around Milan fashion week, in about two weeks) I wanted to share the following morsel. Think of it as a taster course:

The government reduced the cap on permitted cash payments to €1,000 (down from €2,500) in December. According to the designers, who acknowledge the law’s positive genesis — it’s an effort to clamp down on tax evasion (one friend described shopping in Italy as entering a multi-dimensional pricing universe, in which there was the “cash price” and the “charge price” — i.e. the recorded price and the one that was a little more…fungible) — in practice it has meant, says Gabbana, that “we are losing a lot of money in the January sales.”

A snowman wearing a CNN hat at Davos

A snowman at Davos yesterday. AFP/Getty Images

Reading the FT’s live blog from Davos as I sit warm in my hotel room in Paris (it is one of life’s cosmic jokes that Davos always coincides with that ultimate in 1 per cent consumer indulgence, couture), I was struck that among the debates on income inequality, critiques of Angela Merkel’s speech, and the growing concerns of the private equity folks about the end of their special tax status, one of the few topics everyone agreed on was the importance of hats.

Indeed, before the repercussions of George Soros’s lunchtime talk were analysed, his special hat was noted, and compared with the bigger furry hat of FT columnist Martin Wolf. Personally, however, I think both pale in comparison to the enormous furry gloves worn by Sir Martin Sorrell of WPP.

Material World

with Vanessa Friedman

About this blog About Vanessa Blog guide
Vanessa Friedman's blog deals with the fashion/luxury industry from both a corporate and consumer point of view, as well as the subject of dress.



Vanessa FriedmanVanessa has been the FT’s fashion editor since 2003, and is based in New York, though she lived in London for 12 years.
To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact vanessa.friedman@ft.com about the Material World blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Luxury 360

Visit Luxury 360, the FT's new online hub for creative and commercial coverage of the luxury goods industry, featuring news, views and special reports.

Luxury 360

Archive

« AprMay 2012
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031