Friday Jul 4 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

August 10, 2007

Legalisation beats aerial spraying

A footnote to my ealier Column: today’s (August 10, 2007) Financial Times reports that “The US and UK yesterday unveiled a new counter-narcotics plan for Afghanistan, including a stronger eradication effort, in an attempt to deal with the growing poppy cultivation problem in the war-torn country.” That’s bad enough. It then goes on to say “The US wants to use aerial spraying as one way to tackle eradication.” The terminal stupidity and inability to learn of those in charge of the US anti-drug programs and policies never fails to amaze me. Short of showing Allied troops bayoneting babies on prime time news, aerial spraying must be the best way of creating popular support for the Taleban. We know how successful these policies were and how much support it created in the Andean coca growing regions…. In a different, non-drug context, the goodwill lost by the US through its experiments with defoliation through Agent Orange in Vietnam, should have given the US (anti-) Drug czars pause for thought. But learning simply does not take place. When paternalistic morality interferes with normal brain functioning, costly, indeed dreadful things can happen. Fortunately, the aerial spraying proposal “has met strong resistance from many European, Afghan and NATO officials who fear it will undermine counter-insurgency efforts.” I hope the European, Afghan and NATO officials are successful in preventing a worsening situation from worsening even more rapidly. Until we legalise all opium derivatives, that is the most we can hope for.

Labels: , ,

One Response to “Legalisation beats aerial spraying”

Comments

  1. Before you make so strong conclusions you have to look at labor force participation rate in the USA. It was actively growing between 1970 and 1990 from 59% to 67%. This caused the low productivity growth, which compensated the labor force growth in order to retain tha same real GDP growth rate.No European country suffered this problem at the same level due to very modest population growth.By the way, the strong labor force growth resulted in the USA in high inflation - http://inflationusa.blogspot.com

    Posted by: Anonymous | August 10th, 2007 at 8:15 pm | Report this comment

Post a comment

Comment Policy



As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business