Sunday Sep 7 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

April 4, 2008

The green green grass of home

At last a local outbreak of common sense. The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, an independent expert body established under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 that advises government on drug related issues in the UK, has come out against UK government proposals to reverse the 2004 downgrading of cannabis from a class B substance to a class C substance.

I don’t know what irks me more about this government - the puritanical, kill-joy zeal with which it tries to hunt down and eradicate every vice, even those that do not impose material harm on third parties, or its inability/unwillingness to get its brain in gear once its emotions are engaged/the smell of elections is in the air.

Criminalising the sale or use of drugs that don’t cause psychotic behaviour likely to inflict substantial harm on others is hopelessly illiberal - an unacceptable restriction on freedom of choice and on personal responsibility of mentally competent adults. It is also stupid, because unless you are willing to line up all drug users against a wall and shoot them after a fair trial, criminalisation is ineffective and does more harm than good by creating new crimes, criminals and criminal activity.

The following Table shows that, should cannabis get reclassified from class C to class B, a cannabis consumer - even one who does not inhale - could, if (s)he were apprehended and confronted with an unsympathetic Crown Court judge, face up to five years in the slammer. A more extravagant waste of financial and human resources is hard to imagine. I also have never understood the reason for the unequal treatment of sellers and buyers of illegal substances. If ever it took two to tango, it is in a market.

green.png

So when there is a small chink in the armour of the overbearing nanny state, as there was in the UK when cannabis was reclassified to a lesser offence in 2004, one can but rejoice. Reversing this decision, regardless of whether it is because the prime minister’s inner Puritan bossyboots got the better of him or because of a desire to mollify the redtops, would be a retrograde step.

So a muted cheer for the ACMD.

Post a comment

Comment Policy



As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Gadget GuruThe FT's personal technology expert Paul Taylor answers your gadgetry questions

  • Margaret McCartney's blogA forum by GP and FT opinion columnist on healthcare issues

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business