Other than an immense amount of pain, what could the 9.7 per cent unemployment rate cause?
A reduction in the “economy’s potential output, at least temporarily,” according to “several” FOMC members.
That’s quite an admission. The Fed is tasked with maximising employment, in order to maintain long-term growth. And now, it turns out, that the failure of the Fed to maximise employment means that we’re looking at a smaller economy. The “at least temporarily” qualifier is scant comfort. The alternative, of course, is that we’d be looking at a permanently smaller economy because unemployment was allowed to reach these levels. Let’s hope that’s not the case.
FOMC members proffered one argument that unemployment might not be as bad as it appears. Read more



Older entries
Chris Giles
Michael Steen
Robin Harding
Ralph Atkins
Claire Jones