The first cut isn’t always the deepest

Getty ImagesThe first £5.75bn of spending cuts has just been announced by George Osborne, Conservative chancellor, and David Laws, his Liberal Democrat chief secretary, in the Treasury garden. It is something of a spectator sport for large numbers of Treasury officials, who seem either keen to get the knives out, or who have too little to work on and are ripe for the chop.

But these cuts represent just the starter, “the first steps” as Mr Laws admitted. The main course is coming later. This near £5.75bn (the announced £6.2 net the £500m which will be recycled back into frontline services) is tiny compared with the £40bn to £50bn that is coming from 2011 onward. So it is worth not getting too excited by today’s cuts.

Here are the big questions and some initial answers.

1. Do the numbers add up? Yes, they seem to. The cuts in spending are applied to government department budgets and so they will release cash. Staff hiring freezes do save money, as does abolishing quangos, as does stopping certain projects. There are also big cuts are in grants to local authorities. Look at the chart below and you can see that the communities department is taking the biggest proportionate hit, with smallest hits in education and the devolved administration budgets. The detail on what will be cut is scant at present, but the departments know they do not have this money to spend any more.

2. Will the cuts threaten the economic recovery? Almost certainly not, but they will not help. £6bn represents one tenth of the amount the Treasury expects the economy to grow this financial year, so you would need the mother of all multipliers between spending cuts and economic output for these to cause a double dip. That said, the cuts are likely to damp growth a little, to the extent that any effect is evident. The much bigger effects will come next year.

3. Do the cuts represent efficiency savings? Far from all of them do. The cuts are better described as attempts to root out the lowest value public spending. So there are some cuts to welfare payments, such as child trust funds and some programmes, such as “Train to Gain”. The pure efficiency savings, I am sure, will be found, but the Treasury has left this to individual departments, who, in turn, will pass the buck to local authorities and individual spending bodies. So the answer to this question will take some time.

4. Will they be noticed? Almost certainly. All government spending pays for people or goods and services. So those suppliers will lose out. Fewer people will be employed. About 30,000 jobs turn over every year in the civil service, so that is a rough estimate of the number of posts that will go. The government will buy fewer goods and services from UK companies and this will cause some pain in the private sector.

5. What is coming next? The real action on public spending will come by October in the Budget and the Spending review. That is when the cuts will really be noticed and will put Britain into what Mr Laws says will be an “age of austerity” in the public sector.

Money Supply

Central bank blog

About this blog Blog guide
Opinions on market-moving economics and central banks around the world.


To comment, please register for free with FT.com. Read our policy on comments and include your name when submitting a comment.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact claire.jones@ft.com about the Money Supply blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Editor’s choice

David Daokui Li

My lessons from life as a Chinese central banker

Euro in crisis

Fears of a Greek exit mount

The Money Supply team

Chris Giles Chris Giles has been the economics editor of the Financial Times since 2004. Based in London, he writes about international economic trends and the British economy. Before reporting economics for the Financial Times, he wrote editorials for the paper, reported for the BBC, worked as a regulator of the broadcasting industry and undertook research for the Institute for Fiscal Studies. RSS

Ralph Atkins, Frankfurt bureau chief, has been writing about European economics and politics for the Financial Times for more than 20 years following an economics degree from Cambridge. He has been watching the European Central Bank and eurozone economies since 2004. He has previously worked in London, Bonn, Berlin, Jerusalem and Brussels. RSS

Robin Harding is the FT's US economics editor, based in Washington. Prior to this, he was based in Tokyo, covering the Bank of Japan and Japan's technology sector, and in London as an economics leader writer. Robin studied economics at Cambridge and has a masters in economics from Hitotsubashi University, where he was a Monbusho scholar. Before joining the FT, Robin worked in asset management and banking. RSS

Claire Jones is Money Supply economics team writer, based in London. Before joining the Financial Times, she was the editor of the Central Banking journal and CentralBanking.com. Claire studied philosophy and economics at the London School of Economics. RSS

James Politi is US economics and trade correspondent for the Financial Times, based in Washington DC. He joined the Washington bureau in January 2008 following four and a half years as US deals correspondent covering M&A and private equity. James Politi joined the FT in London in 2000 with an MSc at the London School of Economics, and undergraduate degrees from Georgetown University and the University of Florence. RSS

Archive

« Apr Jun »May 2010
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31