Monthly Archives: February 2014

Robin Harding

There could be serious financial turmoil when the Fed eventually raises interest rates, even without a lot of leverage in the financial system, according to this year’s paper at the US Monetary Policy Forum in New York. If the analysis is correct then it is an argument against very easy monetary policy – but the paper is quite limited.

(The USMPF, organised by the Chicago Booth business school, is a once-a-year event where a group of market economists present a paper to a gathering of Fed pooh-bahs. The authors this year are Michael Feroli of JP Morgan, Anil Kashyap of Chicago Booth, Kermit Schoenholtz of NYU Stern and Hyun Song Shin of Princeton.) Read more

Once upon a time, the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee sounded like a group of nine individuals with differing views. One of the most interesting aspects of Mark Carney’s arrival is the monotone now coming from the interest-rate setting committee.

It has been noticed: for example Fathom Consulting put this slide up at its recent monetary policy forum.

In a note last week, JP Morgan also made a rather damming comparison between the BoE’s reticence to acknowledge any discussion over a new form of guidance with the Federal Reserve’s minutes which demonstrated a healthy debate over the options. Allan Monks, the author of the note, concluded:

” In our view, the lack of discussion about the presentation and specifics of this new ‘framework’, or the consideration of any alternatives, does not suggest the committee as a whole is strongly invested in it. While Governor Carney may suggest policy-setting has undergone another innovation, the rest of the MPC has merely acquiesced and views the changes through a different lens.”

 Read more

Claire Jones

January’s eurozone inflation number, out earlier on Monday, showed price pressures in the currency bloc are not quite as subdued as first feared, registering 0.8 per cent – a touch higher than Eurostat’s initial estimate of 0.7 per cent.

It’s hardly a game changer: inflation is still less than half the 2 per cent target. But the slightly better figure will reduce pressure on the European Central Bank a little after it faced renewed calls to ease policy following the release of the flash estimate.

However, the detail of this morning’s release suggest disinflationary pressures might be even worse than feared. This excellent chart from Marchel Alexandrovich of Jefferies International shows why: Read more

The question seems absurd. John Rentoul of the Sunday Independent would be tempted to add it immediately to his list of journalistic questions to which the answer is “no”. I think the answer is obviously “no”.

But the Treasury and the Information Commissioner believe anyone revealing details of the Bank of England’s forecasts is doing something that is:

“likely to have a destabilising effect on the financial markets and thus have a prejudicial effect on the economic interests of all or part of the UK”.

Hence, in the eyes of government, Mr Carney, who revealed details of the BoE forecasts on Wednesday, is something of a traitor. At least that was the view of the Treasury last year. Read more

John Aglionby

With the UK unemployment rate falling faster than expected towards his 7.0 per cent threshold as the economic recovery picks up steam, Bank of England Governor Mark Carney is under pressure from the markets to update his forward guidance on interest rates when he presents his quarterly inflation review.

The Monetary Policy Committee will also reveal its quarterly forecasts for growth and inflation

By Sarah O’Connor and John Aglionby


Emily Cadman

Welcome to our live coverage of ECB president Mario Draghi monthly press conference. Earlier, to the surprise of some, the ECB kept its rates on hold. Follow the questions and reaction live here with capital markets editor Ralph Atkins and Emily Cadman


Robin Harding

After the Reserve Bank of India’s Raghuram Rajan took the Fed and other developed country central banks to task this week for ignoring turmoil in emerging markets, Richard Fisher, president of the Dallas Fed, gave the standard retort on Friday. He said the US central bank must make policy according to what is best for America.

Doing so means the only reason the Fed would change its monetary policy is if trouble in emerging markets had a direct effect on the US. There are two main channels – exports and financial markets – but neither looks likely to hurt the US unless the EM turmoil gets a lot more severe. Thus while the Fed may make a greater show of consultation, and soak up some flak at the G20, its actions this year are unlikely to change. Read more