What’s causing the foreclosure crisis? Is it the correction in home prices across the US from bubble-induced highs or is it, as many claim, a result of lax lending standards and predatory subprime loans?
The distinction isn’t just splitting hairs. Governors of the Federal Reserve and other policy makers have put quite a bit of effort into blaming failures of mortgage regulation (rather than market failures) for the crisis. But are no-income McMansion moms really the ones feeding the foreclosures? Or are otherwise credit-worthy homebuyers defaulting as they realise they owe hundreds of thousands more than their home is worth? After all – I can afford to pay back a loan of $500, but if I’ve used it to buy a tulip bulb that’s now worth $1.50, I might just decide to cut my losses and give it to the bank to garden.
Crunching the numbers leads to some interesting, if inconclusive, results. Read more
No change in the Fed funds rate. And no change in the extended period language. But, lest readers begin seeing monthly Fed funds meetings as uneventful, there has been a relatively interesting change in the Fed’s view of financial conditions.
From today’s statement: Read more
Charles Plosser, president of the Philadelphia Fed, today gave a quite interesting speech on developing regulation to address too-big-to-fail financial institutions. His comments (well worth a read) on the Squam Lake Group’s recommendations (also worth a read) come after a lull in the too-big-to-fail discussion. A few months back, living wills, robust resolution mechanisms, and early intervention were at the forefront of the public policy debate. But as the european debt crisis has captured headlines, officials have been quieter on their plans to address the TBTF problem (until today’s conference), with the notable exception of St Louis Fed president James Bullard, who’s been explicitly stating the implicit guarantee still holds. Read more
If we are indeed facing a double dip downturn, James Bullard’s comments today on the strength of the global recovery will be long remembered.
Apparently unconcerned that the Fed (after missing the US housing bubble) would have lost credibility in its ‘no bubble!’ declarations, the St Louis Fed president said today:
While I am sympathetic to the possibility of ‘bubble’ phenomena in macroeconomics generally speaking, I do not think that we should interpret China in this light at the current juncture.
The terror of bad economic policy.
Some 79 per cent of Americans think the budget deficit is an extremely or very serious threat to the future of the country: the same percentage as for terrorism, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll.
US residents also tend to prefer Republicans to Democrats when dealing with these issues.
Is this preference fact-based? Are Republicans, in fact, better than Democrats at keeping America’s shores safe and its budget in line?
There’s no easy way to measure terrorism, but budget deficits are quantifiable. So who’s done a better job balancing them?
Here’s the chart for the last 40 years. Read more
Fans of Donald Kohn, second in command at the Federal Reserve, have a temporary reprieve today. Mr Kohn, who was slated to leave the Fed in a couple weeks, will now stay on perhaps until September.
Here’s the Fed’s statement:
Vice Chairman Donald L. Kohn announced on Friday that, at the request of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, he plans to remain on the Board until a new Governor is appointed but to leave no later than September 1. He had announced in March that he intended to resign at the expiration of his term as Vice Chairman on June 23, 2010. While he remains on the Board as a Governor, he will continue to participate in all Board and Federal Open Market Committee meetings.
Janet Yellen, now San Francisco Fed president, was nominated by President Barack Obama back in April to fill the soon-to-be vacant slot, but so far, there have been few visible moves to get the Senate confirmation process in motion – and Republicans have been actively obstructionist in confirming Obama picks to any government post. Read more
The Beige book backs Bernanke. The economy’s improving, albeit modestly, according to the aggregation of anecdotal evidence of economic activity in the 12 Federal Reserve districts. No big shockers in the report, but a few interesting items:
- BP spill. Tourism’s up almost across the board, but the oil spill may be a drag. Atlanta reported “that the Gulf oil spill and Tennessee floods had already resulted in some vacation lodging cancellations. The potential exists for a much greater impact, although contacts are quite uncertain as to the ultimate effects.”
Today’s jobs numbers, which showed only 41,000 private sector jobs gained, were a disappointment. And where there are disappointments, there are losers. But where there are gains, there are winners! So, without further ado, this month’s list of job market winners and losers.
Winners Read more
Well that was disappointing. The private sector in the US added only 41,000 jobs in May, compared with a 218,000 gain in April, and well below economists expectations.
But, hey, gains are gains. And among those over 25, the only group for whom the unemployment rate fell were people with who had at least a bachelor’s degree. Which implies that at least some of the gains were among high-wage job seekers (or, if you like, the working rich).
So where are people who earn over $100,000 getting jobs? According to a survey from TheLadders.com, a job searching service for high-income professionals, the five cities with the strongest job markets were Seattle, San Francisco, San Diego, Washington DC and Boston. The top sectors, the group says, were aerospace and defence, biotech, e-commerce, engineering, financial services, IT and software. Read more