Irish stress tests reveal a capital shortfall of €24bn, comprising:
- Allied Irish – €13.3bn
- Bank of Ireland – €5.2bn
- Irish Life – €4bn
- EBS – €1.5bn
Note: Anglo Irish Bank and Irish Nationwide Building Society were not included in the exercise because their loan books are being wound down. Anglo was fully nationalised in January 2009 and Nationwide is “effectively state-owned”. Both have required substantial state aid.
The headline figure of €24bn is better than many expected, particularly since about a fifth of it is for an additional capital “buffer” that goes beyond the 10.5 per cent tier one requirement in the base scenario, and 6 per cent requirement in the adverse scenario. Without this additional requirement, the recapitalisation requirement would be €18.7bn. The Irish central bank seems to have gone for the warts-and-all approach, which bodes well for the reliability of the numbers.
As well as raising new capital, banks will need to sell many of their non-core assets, following a deleveraging plan agreed with the central bank “in order to transition to smaller balance sheets and a more stable funding base”. They will separate assets into core and non-core, gradually selling off the latter. But shareholders, take heart: first, this will not be done in a hurry; second, the losses this will inevitably incur are already factored into the analysis: Read more
No stress tests for ages, then they all come along at once.
Some banks are set to raise their dividends imminently in the US, once the Fed gives them the green light ahead of detailed stress test results released in secret next month. Another practice put on hold in 2009 – share buybacks – will also be back on the menu for some of the 19 large banks. Only those groups that wanted to increase dividends or share buy-backs, or repay government capital, received a call from the Fed on Friday. Those receiving good news will no doubt act swiftly: any of these activities will presumably be seen as a public badge of honour, in the absence of results publication.
Europe, meanwhile, does intend to publish results. Arguably the target audience for Europe’s stress tests is investors and markets rather than the banks themselves. This might give the unfortunate impression that policymakers are aiming for the appearance of a healthy banking sector rather than the real thing. Read more
Irish banks may need more than the €10bn set aside for them in the bail-out, the Irish finance minister has said.
Michael Noonan said in Brussels today that recapitalising Irish banks could not take place till stress tests were completed, but that he would be “surprised” if €10bn were enough. The Irish Independent claimed over the weekend that “a further injection of between €15bn and €25bn could now be needed”. Mr Noonan told reporters he expected the size of the shortfall to be revealed by stress tests, whose results are due to be published by the end of March. Read more
The tests on 88 EU lenders holding 65 per cent of the bloc’s total assets over the coming months are structured to determine how well banks would hold up in a severe economic crisis. Criteria for banks’ passing or failing the test are due to be set next month.
The documents, seen by Reuters, show that the adverse scenarios include: Read more
Holdings of sovereign debt will be included in European stress tests, which will include country-specific adverse scenarios designed by the ECB. There was some doubt whether sovereign debt would be included after Cebs, the EBA’s predecessor, was reported in November saying it wasn’t “clear that a repeat of the sovereign risk sensitivity analysis will be necessary in 2011″. How times change.
Collaboration on methodology will begin tomorrow (Friday) between the EBA and individual countries’ supervisory bodies. Scenarios plus the sample of banks will be published March 18. Broad principles of stress test methodology are expected in April. Several months will be needed to complete the tests, which will be published in June. (Note: new US stress tests, which are due for completion this month, will not be published.) And what will happen should a bank fail? Read more
European stress tests will be held in the first half of this year and published in the summer, the European Banking Association* has announced. They will be accompanied by a review of liquidity funding risks:
The EBA will, as part of its regular cycle of risk assessments, initiate a separate thematic review of liquidity funding risks across the EU banking sector in the first quarter of 2011. The EBA will use this internal review to inform supervisory authorities about areas of vulnerability in relation to liquidity risk.
It looks as though the liquidity assessment will remain private, though the stress tests will be published. We’ve asked the EBA for confirmation and will update you.
No mention of the sovereign holdings part being scrapped; perhaps, in light of current shenanigans in Europe, the EBA felt they might be needed. Read more
To add to the prevailing sense of deja vu, regulators in both the US and Europe are this week discussing new banking stress tests. There is a significant difference with the new tests, however: they are to be part of regular, ongoing scenario analyses, and the results in the US, at least, will remain private. The first round of stress tests were public and aimed at reassurance.
The Federal Reserve is expected to start analysing data provided by 19 large banks this week, to work out how their balance sheets would withstand a variety of new shocks. “Only banks that have repaid government bail-outs and can prove a lifted dividend will not compromise their safety will be allowed to return cash to investors,” write Francesco Guerrera and Tom Braithwaite. “The Fed will also decide whether banks are on course to meet more stringent rules on capital requirements, agreed by the international Basel committee last year.” Tests are expected to be completed by March and are expected to be similar in content to those of May 2009. Read more
Breathe easy: Luxembourg’s banks have performed well in a national stress test. The two larger banks, Dexia and KBC, performed well in Europe-wide stress tests earlier in the year, so you’ll be forgiven for having been quite unconcerned about the small state’s banking sector.
The scenarios were concocted a while back, it seems. Of the four shocks, falling property prices or falling EU GDP have the greatest negative impact on the banks’ capital ratios. The good news is that the ratios remain comfortably above 4 per cent in each case. The bad news is that the shocks are independent, and it is more than plausible that house prices would fall and growth reverse at the same time. After all, we’ve seen that before, quite recently. Read more
If a sovereign default had been factored into the recent stress tests, which banks would have failed and how severe would the contagion have been?
Not too many and not too bad, says the Peterson Institute. They used the sovereign holdings provided by 84 of the 91 banks to model an additional shock: namely, a Greek default. Researchers find bank collapses to be relatively limited – Greek banks collapse, predictably, as do those in Cyprus, but: Read more
*Updated to included the originally missing bank, Sunday 10.21am
The results are in. Complaints have already begun that the stress tests weren’t stringent enough, but with the handy table below, you can fashion your own stress test… just pick your preferred Tier 1 ratio and click the column heading to sort. Read more
The stress test results are out now and seven European banks have failed – five Spanish banks, one already failed German bank and one Greek bank. Over the next few hours and days, investors will digest the considerable information put out by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors and decide whether they agree with the following conclusion from CEBS.
The aggregate results suggest a rather strong resilience for the EU banking system as a whole and may appear reassuring for the banks in the exercise, although it should be emphasized that this outcome is partly due to the continued reliance on government support for a number of institutions.
If investors are similarly reassured, it should ease pressures in bank funding markets and limit the chances of a further liquidity squeeze on European banks. If not, the exercise could backfire. Read more
July 23: stress test result day, right? Wrong. Consolidated results are now to be released on that date, with individual banks’ results delayed by two weeks. Cue a fortnight of frenzied speculation in the markets, as investors try to work out which banks are at the vulnerable end of anonymous bar charts and scatter plots. Presumably this has been done to allow banks more time to raise equity. But then, after two weeks of volatility, even some banks that have fared well will be needing it!
This decision seems to miss the point that stress tests are all about shoring up market confidence. Even bad results can be taken well by markets if investors believe the scenarios are accurate, transparent and really do consider the worst possible situation. Indeed, equity markets rose after the SCAP results from US stress tests last year. But then US markets could have the ultimate confidence in their banks, because the US government had pledged to bail-out any banks subsequently unable to raise funds through the markets. European banks – at this point – come with no such guarantee.
We’ve got details on purpose and sample, but methodology is thin on the ground. See the table: there are two scenarios and at least five variables, but only one of the ten resulting methods is supplied. Sigh.
The aim of the tests are described in the statement:
1) to assess the banks’ ability to absorb further shocks on credit / market risks, including sovereign risks;
2) to assess current dependence on public support (read: can we exit safely yet?) Read more
The data’s finally out. There are 91 banks. More to follow on methodology.
There is a lot going on behind the scenes in German banking circles to prepare for the publication of Europe-wide “stress test” results later this month. German banks were always the most opposed, for a mixture of principled reasons (they are a bit of a PR gimmick) and fears about what they would reveal.
But the exercise is not only a test for the banks themselves. It is also a challenge for Axel Weber, the Bundesbank president who is tipped as a possible successor to Jean-Claude Trichet, when the European Central Bank president’s non-renewable eight year term expires in November next year. Read more
Several banks are likely to need to raise fresh capital, if European stress tests are anything like their American predecessors a year ago (see chart, right). The key question for the resulting stability of the banking sector is what the market has already priced in.
This time last year, US stress tests were published. Bank of America came off worst, needing $33.9bn more equity (though in the days following, its share price rose).
After the tests, US regulators ordered 10 of the largest banks to add a total of $75bn in equity, resulting in share sales, conversion of preferred stock and the occasional debt sale too.
Below is a list of the top 25 European banks by assets under management, as food for thought over the weekend: Read more
Name a small country exposed to a large banking sector. No, not Iceland. Belgium, courtesy of Fortis and Dexia.
So is Belgium most at risk from the EU’s new commitment to stress test transparency? Possibly, says Jacob Funk Kirkegaard in an article for the Peterson Institute. But that would be a small price to pay: Read more
** corrected at 16.40 to read “in the near future” instead of “next few days”
Spain’s central bank has thrown down the gauntlet to bank regulators elsewhere in Europe, saying it plans to publish the results of “stress tests” on the country’s financial institutions in the near future to clear up doubts about Spain’s banking system. (Berlin has also dropped resistance to the plan.) Read more