May 3rd, 2007
France’s great debate
It’s past midnight in Paris and I’ve just finished watching the great debate - the long-awaited face-off between Nicolas Sarkozy and Ségolène Royal.
My verdict? Bizarrely boring; bizarrely parochial - and probably a narrow victory for Sarkozy.
I know France is a serious country - but letting the debate run for two and a half hours seemed to be a bit of a punishment for even the most serious-minded of citizens. Worse, despite the acres of time available to them, they barely discussed some of the most serious issues facing France. There was no discussion - and I mean none - of the fact that in 2005 France faced over three weeks of nightly riots. You might have thought that rated a mention. And in 150 minutes of debate, they spent barely 15 minutes discussing the outside world.
Instead, the two candidates got lost in the finer details of social and economic policy. I know that France faces serious economic problems. And they had a good and fairly clear discussion of the economics of the 35-hour-week. (I thought Sarkozy scored heavily there - but then I agree with him that it’s a mad law) But was it really necessary to spend quite so much time on issues like civil-service reform, nuclear power and the school curriculum - while barely discussing the social problems of France’s suburbs, or the collapse of France’s European policy?










